An eccentric tycoon left his fortune to the woman who had the most babies—sparking a frenzy in Depression-era Toronto

An eccentric tycoon left his fortune to the woman who had the most babies—sparking a frenzy in Depression-era Toronto

A Fortune With A Bizarre Catch

When wealthy Toronto lawyer Charles Vance Millar died in 1926, he left most of his estate to an unidentified woman. The winner would be whichever Toronto mother gave birth to the greatest number of children during the next ten years. That extraordinary offer sparked a contest remembered as the Great Stork Derby.

John William Carter shown with his wife and family; entrants in the Great Stork Derby in Toronto, October 26 1936Toronto Star Archives, Getty Images

Advertisement

The Man Behind The Derby

Millar was born in Aylmer, Ontario, on June 28, 1854. He became a successful lawyer, businessman, investor, and racehorse owner. By the time of his death, he had accumulated substantial assets in breweries, real estate, transportation, and other ventures.

Charles Vance Millar (1853-1926)Unknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Toronto’s Famous Practical Joker

The prosperous bachelor also acquired a reputation for practical jokes. According to accounts of his life, he enjoyed testing how people behaved when temptation suddenly appeared. His final will turned that mischievous instinct into a very public spectacle.

man writing on paperScott Graham, Unsplash

Advertisement

He Had No Immediate Heirs

Millar never married and had no children of his own. He stated in his will that he had no dependents or close relatives whom he was obliged to support. That freedom allowed him to distribute his property in ways that most lawyers would never recommend.

last will and testament white printer paperMelinda Gimpel, Unsplash

Advertisement

An Uncommon And Capricious Will

Millar openly called his will “necessarily uncommon and capricious.” He said the property demonstrated his foolishness in accumulating more wealth than he had needed during his lifetime. The document then proved just how unconventional he could be.

Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)

Advertisement

Ministers Faced A Moral Test

One provision awarded shares in the O’Keefe brewery to Protestant ministers and temperance supporters. Accepting the shares meant potentially benefiting from the alcohol business they publicly opposed. Millar appeared to enjoy placing respectable people in uncomfortable positions.

Advertising poster for the O'Keefe Brewery Company of Toronto Limited.Unknown artist, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Rivals In A Jamaican House

Another clause granted three Toronto lawyers joint ownership of Millar’s vacation property in Jamaica. The men reportedly disliked one another, making shared ownership especially awkward. As with the brewery shares, the arrangement placed personal principles and relationships under pressure.

Looking south Tower I of The Crossing at Jamaica Station complex (left) and the Jamaica Hampton Inn & Suites hotel (right) on Archer Avenue, looking from Jamaica Avenue and 149th Street in Jamaica, Queens. The towers are part of the growing Jamaica skylinTdorante10, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Horse Racing Opponents Got Shares

Millar also left Ontario Jockey Club shares to people known for opposing horse racing. The gift confronted its recipients with a choice between their stated beliefs and a possible financial benefit. Yet even this provision looked ordinary beside the final clause.

Identifier: loversofhorsebri00roseuoft (find matches)
Title: Lovers of the horse : brief sketches of men and women of the Dominion of Canada devoted to the noblest of animals. --
Year: 1909 (1900s)
Authors:  Rose, Geo. Maclean (George Maclean), 1829-1898
Internet Archive Book Images, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Tenth Clause Changed Everything

Millar instructed his executors to hold the remainder of his estate for ten years after his death. They would then convert it into cash and award it to the Toronto mother who had produced the most children during that period. If several women tied, the money would be divided among them.

 The staid corridors of Osgoode Hall were to-day visited by counsel for the executors and trustees of CANADA - NOVEMBER 06: The staid corridors of Osgoode Hall were to-day visited by counsel for the executors and trustees of Charles Vance Millar's will; counsel for the leaders in the Millar Will Maternity Race; some of the claimants themselves and other interested parties; to attend the Millar will hearing before Mr. Justice Middleton. Toronto Star Archives, Getty Images

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

The Clock Started On Halloween

Millar died suddenly in Toronto on October 31, 1926, at the age of 72. His death began the ten-year period specified in the will. Eligible births therefore had to occur in Toronto between October 31, 1926, and October 31, 1936.

North West Corner of Yonge and Dundas, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaWilliam James, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Many Expected Another Will

Some of Millar’s associates initially suspected that the document was a hoax. They believed a newer and more conventional will might eventually surface. None did, and the unusual document passed through probate in December 1926.

Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)

Advertisement

The Contest Began Quietly

Despite its sensational premise, the baby clause did not immediately dominate Toronto’s newspapers. Most potential contestants were ordinary women raising families rather than people who had formally entered an organized competition. The public spectacle developed gradually as journalists identified possible leaders.

Queen Street West, south side, looking east from York Street.  Toronto, Ontario, Canada.William James, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Depression Raised The Stakes

The Wall Street crash of 1929 helped trigger an economic crisis that struck Canada especially hard. Unemployment, poverty, and insecurity made Millar’s growing estate enormously attractive to struggling households. What might have seemed like an absurd joke in 1926 represented possible salvation a few years later.

Crowd gathering on Wall Street in New York after the Wall Street crash late October 1929.Associated Press, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Newspapers Discovered A Sensation

Local coverage of leading mothers began appearing more frequently around 1930. The Toronto Daily Star and the Toronto Evening Telegram competed for readers by pursuing contenders and investigating their families. Newspapers elsewhere in Canada and the United States soon joined the chase.

File:1930 Toronto KingSt looking East to BaySt.jpgThemedpark, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Grace Bagnato Entered The Spotlight

Much of the early attention focused on Grace Bagnato, a Toronto woman of Italian heritage. Reports in 1930 said she had given birth to 20 children in total, although only some had survived and qualified for the Derby period. Her prominence exposed the prejudice faced by immigrant families in interwar Toronto.

Victor and loser. Mrs. Grace Bagnato (Right); an early contender for the Millar will fortune; came wToronto Star Archives, Getty Images

Advertisement

Florence Brown Challenged Her

Florence Brown also attracted attention after claiming that she had given birth to 26 children, with six arriving after Millar’s death. Newspapers portrayed Brown and Bagnato as rivals. The coverage often mixed the contest with inflammatory arguments about immigration and Canadian identity.

Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)

Advertisement

The Government Tried To Intervene

In 1932, Ontario’s legislature considered a bill that would redirect the unclaimed portion of Millar’s estate to the University of Toronto. Supporters argued that intervention was justified on public-policy grounds. Public opposition helped force the government to withdraw the proposal.

Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)

Advertisement

The Field Kept Changing

New contenders appeared as the deadline approached, while others slipped out of the running. Some families contacted the press after hearing about the prize, but reporters actively located other possible winners. Several women avoided publicity or used assumed names because the attention could become intrusive.

Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)

Advertisement

Publicity Came At A Price

A few contestants obtained advertising or photography opportunities from their sudden fame. They also endured unwanted visitors, invasive reporting, threats, and attempts to influence their claims. Private experiences involving pregnancy, childbirth, and infant loss became material for newspaper competition.

Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)

Advertisement

The Rules Were Dangerously Vague

Millar required births to be shown through registrations made under Ontario’s Vital Statistics Act. However, his will did not clearly explain whether stillborn children or children born outside marriage should count. Those omissions ensured that the final standings would be decided by lawyers and judges.

Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)

The Mothers Bore The Burden

The Derby was frequently presented as light entertainment, but repeated pregnancies could impose a severe physical cost. Contemporary reports described contestants undergoing operations, hospitalization, and blood transfusions. Families were also trying to feed and house numerous children during the worst economic crisis of their generation.

Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)

Advertisement

Toronto Watched The Finish

Public interest intensified as the October 31, 1936, deadline approached. Newspapers speculated about surprise contestants and the possibility that twins or triplets might alter the standings. Ontario Premier Mitchell Hepburn condemned the Derby as a revolting public exhibition.

Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Yonge and Queen Streets - Looking South West. The Simpson's department store. The future Hudson's Bay Company store.Finavon, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Relatives Challenged The Will

Distant relatives of Millar attempted to have the controversial bequest invalidated. They argued, among other things, that the clause violated public policy by encouraging births outside marriage. Canadian courts rejected the effort to overturn the will.

Photograph of the judges of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in 1934. Depicted from left to right are: Rt. Hon. Sir William Mulock, P.C., K.C.M.G. (Chief Justice of Ontario), Hon. Mr. Justice Riddell, Hon. Mr. Justice Middleton, Hon. Mr. Justice Masten, HoCharles Aylett, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Supreme Court Settled Its Legality

The dispute reached the Supreme Court of Canada in 1937. On December 22, the court upheld the validity of Millar’s gift and rejected the public-policy challenge. Its interpretation nevertheless restricted which children could be included in the count.

The Supreme Court of Canada, Ottawa. Built 1937 by Ernest Cormier. Statues are of Justice and Truth by Walter Allward.Reading Tom from Reading, UK, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Six Women Reached The Final Stage

By February 1938, the litigation had reduced the field to six serious claimants. Grace Bagnato was excluded because two of the children included in her claim had not been properly registered. Pauline Mae Clarke and Lillian Kenny also faced disqualification because some of their claimed children did not satisfy the court’s requirements concerning marriage, registration, and live births.

Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)Screenshot from The Stork Derby, Muse Entertainment Enterprises (2002)

Advertisement

Four Mothers Shared The Fortune

Annie Katherine Smith, Kathleen Ellen Nagle, Lucy Alice Timleck, and Isabel Mary MacLean emerged as the official winners. Each had given birth to nine qualifying children during the ten-year period. The four women reportedly received approximately $110,000 apiece, an extraordinary sum during the late 1930s. Clarke and the Kenny family later received smaller out-of-court settlements after pursuing further claims.

 After winning a major portion of the $500;000 Millar will stork derby fortune; Mr. and Mrs. Arthur TToronto Star Archives, Getty Images

Advertisement

Millar’s Joke Became A Darker Legacy

Millar’s bizarre bequest transformed several families’ finances, but the money came after years of legal battles and relentless public scrutiny. Women’s pregnancies, marriages, and private losses became entertainment for newspapers and curious readers. The Great Stork Derby remains a revealing story about poverty, prejudice, reproductive politics, and sensational journalism in Depression-era Toronto.

Mr. and Mrs. Steffano Darrigo of Toronto; and their family of 12. Mrs. Darrigo claims that she has hToronto Star Archives, Getty Images

Advertisement

You May Also Like: 

How Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Fell For The Cottingley Fairies Hoax

The “Rainmaker” Charles Hatfield promised to end a drought—what followed was one of San Diego’s worst natural disasters

The Coney Island Incubator Babies Were Put On Display, But The Spectacle Actually Saved Lives

Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7


More from Factinate

More from Factinate




Dear reader,


Want to tell us to write facts on a topic? We’re always looking for your input! Please reach out to us to let us know what you’re interested in reading. Your suggestions can be as general or specific as you like, from “Life” to “Compact Cars and Trucks” to “A Subspecies of Capybara Called Hydrochoerus Isthmius.” We’ll get our writers on it because we want to create articles on the topics you’re interested in. Please submit feedback to hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your time!


Do you question the accuracy of a fact you just read? At Factinate, we’re dedicated to getting things right. Our credibility is the turbo-charged engine of our success. We want our readers to trust us. Our editors are instructed to fact check thoroughly, including finding at least three references for each fact. However, despite our best efforts, we sometimes miss the mark. When we do, we depend on our loyal, helpful readers to point out how we can do better. Please let us know if a fact we’ve published is inaccurate (or even if you just suspect it’s inaccurate) by reaching out to us at hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your help!


Warmest regards,



The Factinate team




Want to learn something new every day?

Join thousands of others and start your morning with our Fact Of The Day newsletter.

Thank you!

Error, please try again.