Righteous Facts About Clarence Darrow, The Lawyer With A Gift For Gab

Righteous Facts About Clarence Darrow, The Lawyer With A Gift For Gab

He Was The Real Thing

Old movie fans will recognize the stock character of the small-town lawyer, who dollops out equal amounts of wisdom and goodwill. Well, Clarence Darrow might have been the prototype of this familiar trope, but his speeches were way too long for any motion picture. Darrow made a name for himself as the long-winded champion of underdogs. Then, in one stunning moment, he found himself facing a judge for his own misdeeds.

Clarence Darrow, 1922United States Library of Congress, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

1. His Parents Fought The Good Fight

Clarence Darrow was born on April 18, 1857, in Farmdale, Ohio. Mom was Emily Darrow and she fought for women’s rights and getting women the vote. Dad was Amirus Darrow, and he fought against slavery. Dad was also seen as a free thinker, especially when it came to religion.

With parents like these, it was going to be tough for Darrow to make a name for himself.

Title: Clarence Darrow at Cosmos Club, [Washington, D.C.], 3/14/25
Abstract/medium: 1 negative : glass ; 5 x 7 in. or smallerNational Photo Company Collection, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

2. He Didn’t Finish College

While Darrow enrolled in both Allegheny College and the University of Michigan Law School, he didn't graduate from either. You see, in 1873, there was an economic panic in North America and Europe. Times were tough, and Darrow didn’t want to make things even tougher by draining his family’s finances while at school.

But Darrow wasn't about to give up on the law yet.

Title: Clarence Darrow, 3/4 standing, one leg raised
Abstract/medium: 1 negative : glass ; 5 x 7 in. or smaller.Bain News Service, publisher, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

3. He Didn’t Like School

Clarence Darrow got it into his head that he could teach himself about law. He did this for three years until his family insisted that he go to an actual law school. He went to Ann Arbor and stunned his family by quitting after just one year. He still wasn’t on board with law school, so he just self-studied until he felt he was ready to take the bar exam.

This seemed like a recipe for disaster.

(Original Caption) These pictures may be form Clarence Darrow's bribery trial in 1912. Darrow was charged with bribing jurors in the trial of the McNamara,are brothers, who were accused of bombing the L.A. Times building. Darrow was found innocent in the first trial. A second trial resulted in hung jury.Bettmann, Getty Images

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

4. He Won His First Case

In 1878, Darrow surprised everyone and passed the Ohio bar exam on his first attempt. The following year, he was living in the tiny town of Harvard, Illinois, and got his first case. This was a winner for Darrow, and it prompted him to move to Andover, Ohio, and open up his own law office. Here, Darrow mostly dealt with small complaints, which were typical of the countryside.

Darrow knew he had to go somewhere bigger.

UNITED STATES - JULY 23: During the 'Trial of the Century', defense attorney Clarence Darrow, points a finger up while arguing for the defense in the center of a crowded courtroom in Chicago, July 1924. The young defendants Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb can be seen seated to Darrow's right.Chicago History Museum, Getty Images

Advertisement

5. He Found A Wife

Well, he didn’t go much bigger. Darrow’s next home was in Ashtabula, Ohio: population 5,000. But this move did see Darrow taking part in politics and serving on the town council. It also helped him find a wife. In 1880, he married Jessie Ohl. The two had a son and were soon making a move that would change their lives.

Attorney Clarence Darrow and Wife Aboard Ship Library of Congress, Getty Images

Advertisement

6. He Was A Speaker

Clarence Darrow, his wife Jessie, and their son Paul made the move to the big city. They chose Chicago, and at first it seemed like a terrible mistake. He didn’t have much work in the Windy City, but he managed to make a name for himself. He became known not for practicing law, but for public speaking. This worked, and he finally got himself a job at the city’s law department.

But this was not going to last.

Portrait of American lawyer and Civil Rights activist Clarence Darrow (1857-1938) seated at a desk, circa 1920s. Hulton Archive, Getty Images

Advertisement

7. He Had A Conflict Of Interest

After just two years with the Chicago law department, Darrow got a big break. The Chicago and North-Western Railway Company needed a lawyer, and he jumped ship and signed on. But there was soon trouble. The head of the American Railway Union needed a lawyer, and he turned to Darrow.

Darrow had a problem. He couldn’t take a client from the railway union when he worked for a railway company.

(Original Caption) Close-up of Clarence Darrow in court during the Scopes Trial.Bettmann, Getty Images

Advertisement

8. He Chose The Underdog

Clarence Darrow chose to represent the union head, and this began Darrow’s reputation as a man who would valiantly help the underdog. So, Darrow represented Eugene V Debs, who was in court as one of the leaders of the Pullman Strike. He got Debs off in the first trial but failed in the second. Debs ended up serving a six-month sentence.

But a much more complex case was up next.

American socialist Eugene V. DebsGeorge Grantham Bain, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

9. He Was Headed For The Gallows

On October 28, 1893, Patrick Eugene Prendergast entered the home of the Chicago mayor and opened fire. The mayor, Carter Harrison III, did not survive, and Prendergast was soon behind bars. Prendergast's attorneys failed to get their client off with an insanity defense, and their client was soon facing the noose.

That’s when Darrow stepped in.

Patrick Eugene Prendergast Wikimedia Commons, Modified

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

10. He Couldn’t Help

Clarence Darrow did not sign on to the Prendergast case to free him. He just wanted to avoid a hanging. Darrow and his associates believed that Prendergast’s mental state at the time of the incident made him unfit for capital punishment. Darrow and his team could not convince the judge, and Prendergast faced the noose on July 13, 1894.

Darrow had failed, but he was now very certain what he wanted to fight for.

Patrick Eugene Prendergast during murder trialUnknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

11. He Ended His Marriage

In 1897, Darrow decided to end his marriage. Divorces were not common back then, so Darrow had to consider what this would do to his career. They decided the best tactic would be for him to make the petition for divorce, and the reason he gave was that Jessie had “absented herself" from her husband. This wasn’t true, but the divorce went through anyway.

Darrow would soon regret his decision.

Clarence Darrow, bust portrait, at Dayton, Tennessee, during the Scopes TrialUnderwood & Underwood, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

12. He Made A Mistake

In the divorce, Jessie Darrow received the house and a monthly allowance of $150. A year after the divorce, Darrow came to Jessie with tears in his eyes, saying they had made a mistake. It was too late, and to make sure Darrow understood that, Jessie later married a judge—one whom Darrow had faced in court on more than one occasion.

Darrow dealt with his sadness in the arms of a younger woman.

Clarence Darrow, American lawyer famous for the Scopes TrialUnderwood & Underwood, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

13. He Met A Woman

In 1899, Claence Darrow met journalist Ruby Hammerstrom through a mutual friend. While Darrow was in his early 40s, Hammerstrom was just 26 years old. But it certainly was true love. When Darrow went on a two-week trip to Quebec, Canada, he wrote that he would “give the whole world to have my darling sweet heart with me”.

Darrow was in love, and he had to do something about it.

Title: DARROW, CLARENCE, ATTORNEY
Abstract/medium: 1 negative : glass ; 5 x 7 in. or smallerHarris & Ewing, photographer, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

14. He Tied The Knot

In July 1903, Darrow and Hammerstrom walked down the aisle and became husband and wife. That same year, he seriously considered running for the mayor of Chicago, but instead focused on his firm: Darrow, Masters and Wilson. While with this firm, Darrow faced one of his biggest and most infamous labor cases.

The case of Frank Steunenberg combined two of Darrow’s passions: labor politics and manslaughter.

(Original Caption) 3/6/1923-Miami, FL- Clarence Darrow, one of the most striking figures in the legal world, seen vacationing at Miami.Bettmann, Getty Images

Advertisement

15. It was A Case Tailor-Made For Him

On December 30, 1905, Frank Steunenberg left his house in Caldwell, Idaho, and there was a sudden and very loud blast. As it turned out, someone had set an explosive device at a side gate. Steunenberg, who had been the Governor of Idaho and an enemy of labor unions, lost his life that day. When accusations targeted union leaders from the Western Federation of Miners, Darrow stepped in.

Frank Steunenberg Wikimedia Commons, Modified

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

16. He Helped Them Walk

What came out in the Steunenberg trial was that a man named Harry Orchard had set the explosive device that ended Steunenberg’s life. But what was important was that Orchard said that the men who had hired him to do it were all leaders of the Western Federation of Miners. With Darrow’s expert help, all three members of the union walked away with no sentence. Without Darrow’s defense, Orchard spent the rest of his life behind bars.

While this trial was explosive, his next would be positively nuclear.

Albert Horsley (Harry Orchard)not stated, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

17. It Was An Explosive Case

On October 1, 1910, an explosion in an alley in Los Angeles started a horrible inferno. The fatal fire ended the lives of 21 people. The fact that the explosion was near the Los Angeles Times building made one thing clear. This was part of a campaign by unions to silence the newspaper for its anti-union stance.

It also meant that Darrow would come to the rescue of the accused.

Los Angeles Times Building (built 1886), photo about 1887Unknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

18. He Had A Hard Decision To Make

Brothers JJ and JB McNamara stood accused of causing the fatal inferno, which was the result of a bitter battle between unions and union busters. The union president came to Clarence Darrow, as he was now the hero of the unions. But Darrow had a problem. He thought the McNamara brothers were probably guilty.

He had to decide if he could defend two men whom he believed had committed a terrible deed.

John Joseph McNamara James Barnabas McNamara Los Angeles Times bombing 1910California Department of Corrections, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

19. He Wanted To Save Their Lives

Darrow reluctantly took the case of the McNamara brothers. Because he knew they were likely guilty, Darrow began to consider a plea bargain. His reason was to help the brothers escape the gallows. Darrow would do anything to save the lives of these two brothers. It’s possible he went a little too far.

American lawyer and activist Clarence Darrow (1857 - 1938) questions prosecutor, former Secretary of State, and fundamentalist preacher William Jennings Bryan on the courthouse lawn during the 'Scopes Monkey Trial' in which school teacher John Scopes was prosecuted and convicted for teaching the theory of evolution in violation of Tennessee's Butler Act, Dayton, Tennessee, July 20, 1925.Hulton Archive, Getty Images

20. He Risked His Reputation

During the trial of the McNamara brothers, one juror made a stunning revelation. He told authorities that Darrow and the defense team had offered him money to change his vote. Officers detained Darrow’s employee Bert Franklin and charged him with attempted bribery of jurors.

Darrow's reputation was now at risk, and so were the lives of the McNamara brothers.

(Original Caption) 1902- In 1902 when this picture wsa taken, Clarence Darrow, the famed criminal lawyer, was a young man. Even then the magnetism of his eyes, which swayed juries in such famous cases as that of Leopold-Loeb, was apparent. But the famed suspenders are hidden.Bettmann, Getty Images

Advertisement

21. He Was No Hero

The plea deal that Clarence Darrow was working on for the McNamara brothers was now in serious jeopardy. To make it work, the brothers agreed to plead guilty in court. JJ McNamara ended up with a sentence of 15 years. His brother JB, who had set the explosives in the alley, spent the remainder of his life behind bars. The labor movement did not see Darrow as a hero in this case.

And Darrow still had to face a judge over his alleged jury tampering.

(Original Caption) These pictures may be form Clarence Darrow's bribery trial in 1912. Darrow was charged with bribing jurors in the trial of the McNamara,are brothers, who were accused of bombing the L.A. Times building. Darrow was found innocent in the first trial. A second trial resulted in hung jury.Bettmann, Getty Images

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

22. He Was In An Uncomfortable Position

Darrow was certainly comfortable in a courtroom, but now he was joining the ranks of the accused. Prosecutors were ready to charge him with paying off jurors, and Darrow hired Earl Rogers—who was the prototype for the character of Perry Mason—to defend him. During the trial, the worst thing happened. Rogers became ill and could not continue with the case.

Darrow was suddenly stuck without representation.

Earl Rogers Miscellaneous Items in High Demand, PPOC, Library of Congress, Wikimedia Commons, Enhanced

Advertisement

23. It Was Right Out Of A Movie

The good news was that one of the best lawyers was available to replace Rogers. It was Darrow himself. In something right out of a Hollywood movie, Darrow replaced his own lawyer and began defending himself. Darrow did such a great job that the jury could not agree if he was guilty or not. This would normally lead to a retrial.

But Darrow seemed intent on avoiding this.

2nd January 1926: American lawyer Clarence Darrow (1857 - 1938) sits at a desk at the House Judiciary Committee, Washington, D.C. Hulton Archive, Getty Images

Advertisement

24. He Struck A Deal

To avoid a retrial, Darrow promised never to practice law in California again. Of course, the mystery was still unsolved. Had Darrow actually tried to pay off a juror? Darrow’s lawyer, Earl Rogers, had a daughter. She later wrote that she knew that her “father's private conversations with Darrow included an admission of guilt to his lawyer”.

Darrow was a free man, but his reputation had taken a stunning hit.

American lawyer Clarence Darrow and his wife Ruby in New Orleans, Louisiana, March 11th 1934. Bettmann, Getty Images

Advertisement

25. He Made Them Cry

With the McNamara case ending in controversy, Clarence Darrow lost what had become his bread and butter: defending union cases. He turned his focus to his other passion, which was helping the accused avoid capital punishment. His eloquent speeches on these cases often brought jurors—and in some cases judges—to tears.

But he’d need more than tears to save his next clients.

Screenshot from Darrow (1991) Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

26. It Was A Bizarre Case

When Jacob Franks’ 14-year-old son Bobby went missing, it seemed like a typical abduction for ransom scenario. But this was not the case at all. People soon learned that teenagers Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb carried out the abduction, and the promise of ransom never motivated them. Franks did not survive the ordeal, and this incident now had capital punishment written all over it.

When Darrow joined the case, people started calling it the trial of the century.

Richard Loeb, Nathan Leopold Jr, and Clarence Darrow, looking toward the camera and sitting in a crowded courtroom during the Leopold and Loeb murder trial, Chicago, Illinois, July 24, 1924.Chicago History Museum, Getty Images

Advertisement

27. They Were Monsters

People soon learned that Leopold and Loeb committed their macabre deed for one reason only: They wanted to prove they could do it without getting caught. Both men were from wealthy families and were well-educated. Public opinion could not have been worse for these two.

Darrow had his work cut out for him.

For documentary purposes the German Federal Archive often retained the original image captions, which may be erroneous, biased, obsolete or politically extreme. Zu dem sensationellen Mordprozess der amerik. Millionärssöhne Richard Loeb und Nathan Leopold Unknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

28. He Shocked Everyone

Both Leopold and Loeb had confessed, so what everyone expected was for Clarence Darrow to go with an insanity defense. He shocked everyone by going for a guilty plea. In Darrow’s mind, a life sentence for each boy was the best-case scenario. He thought that a guilty plea was their best defense. Of course, Darrow wasn’t sure it would work.

And then there was a courtroom revelation that changed everything.

Court photo showing Leopold and Loeb on trialUnknown, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

29. There Was A Shock In The Courtroom

Darrow was trying to find anything that could count as a mitigating circumstance for Leopold and Loeb. He even tried saying that being rich had led them to the heinous act. Then, in the middle of the trial, a letter came out. The letter made it clear that the two accused men were more than friends—they were lovers. Cue the courtroom gasp.

This changed the way Darrow saw the case.

Seated left to right, Nathan Leopold, Jr., attorney Clarence Darrow and Richard Loeb. The boys were found guilty of the murder and kidnapping and Bobby Franks.Bettmann, Getty Images

Advertisement

30. He Changed His Tack

Now remember, this was back in the 1920s, and being gay was not common and, in fact, even criminalized in the US at the time. Darrow was now very clear that his clients were insane and not responsible for their act. He brought in “expert witnesses” to list the abnormalities of Leopold and Loeb. Soon it was time for the end of the hearing.

Darrow had something ready that the jury could not have seen coming.

7/31/1924-Chicago, IL-ORIGINAL CAPTION READS: Again and again Clarence Darrow, veteran criminal attorney, reassured Nathan Leopold, Jr., and Richard Loeb, the slayers of little Robert Franks, that he will save them from the gallows for the slaying. Photo is of Darrow and the two killers in confidential conversation. Bettmann, Getty Images

Advertisement

31. He Gave A Long Speech

Clarence Darrow was ready to make his final speech and make sure that neither Leopold nor Loeb ended up receiving capital punishment. His speech became known as his “masterful plea” and it lasted a staggering eight hours. In it, he referred to WWI and how life became cheap to Americans, and he blamed that for the boy’s heinous behavior. In the end, both of the accused received life sentences plus 99 years. This was what Darrow had hoped for.

What Darrow hadn’t anticipated was an outcry from the public.

UNITED STATES - JULY 23: Clarence Darrow, a defense attorney for the Leopold and Loeb murder case, standing and leaning on a counter with an open book on it, Chicago, July 1924.Chicago History Museum, Getty Images

Advertisement

32. He Was Over Paid

While he was fighting for the lives of Leopold and Loeb, some newspapers claimed that Darrow was earning a cool million for his efforts. Average Americans were upset and horrified at Darrow’s greed. Darrow needed to cool the bad publicity and got the accused families to issue a statement that this was not the case. In the end, Darrow only got $30,000 for saving the boys’ lives.

Next, Darrow would take religion on the stand.

Screenshot from Darrow (1991) Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

33. He Fought For Science

In 1925, teacher John T Scopes was facing a strange trial. He was simply teaching what he was supposed to be teaching and got into trouble. You see, the textbook he had to use explained evolution, but the state made teaching evolution against the law. When anti-evolutionist and former Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan joined the case, Clarence Darrow saw a chance for a good old-fashioned debate.

But things were not what they seemed.

July 1925: Attorney Clarence Darrow (1857 - 1938) (L) defence lawyer, with politician William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925), director of the prosecution, in the courtroom during the Scopes 'monkey trial', South Dayton, Tennessee. Bryan died of a cerebral haemorrhage a few days after the trial. Hulton Archive, Getty Images

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

34. It Was A Theatrical Trial

As it turned out, this trial was a sham and was only a scheme to bring attention to Dayton, Tennessee. Worse still, Scopes didn't even remember if he had in fact taught evolution at a school. Darrow didn’t care and enjoyed the theatrics of a trial not about a teacher breaking the rules, but about science in general.

To up the drama, Darrow did something unheard of.

A scene from court in the John Scopes trial. Identified in the photo: Clarence Darrow (2nd from left) and John Scopes (3rd from left). A scene from court in the John Scopes trial. Identified in the photo: Clarence Darrow (2nd from left) and John Scopes (3rd from left). Bettmann, Getty Images

Advertisement

35. He Brought His Opponent To The Stand

Bryan was working for the prosecution, but Darrow surprisingly called him to the stand. Darrow wanted Bryan to be an expert witness about the Bible. It didn’t take long for Darrow’s clever questioning to make the public turn away from Bryan’s way of seeing the case. After spending a lot of the jury's time arguing about evolution, the judge threw it all out.

It was now up to the jury.

Title: W.J. [William Jennings] Bryan
Abstract/medium: 1 negative : glass ; 5 x 7 in. or smaller.Bain News Service, publisher, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

36. He Sent Him To His Grave

In the end, Scopes’ paid his $100 fine and then appealed it. But the real drama was with Darrow and Bryan. The two men had fought bitterly in the courtroom, and it had a macabre outcome. Just five days after the trial, Bryan surprisingly passed from apoplexy— now known hemorrhagic stroke. However, ironically, back then apoplexy was seen as having a connection to anger…which indirectly pointed toward Darrow.

Darrow didn’t have time to wonder if he had played a part in Bryan’s passing. He had a family to save.

July 1925: High-angle view of Clarence Darrow (1857 - 1938) defence lawyer (right) questioning William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925), director of the prosecution, about the Bible during the Scopes 'Monkey Trial', Dayton, Tennessee. Hulton Archive, Getty Images

Advertisement

37. They Needed His Help

On September 9, 1925, a mob gathered around a family home in Detroit, Michigan. They wanted the family out of the neighborhood. The issue was that it was a white neighborhood and the family in the house was Black. When shots rang out, and one of the mob members outside was fatally wounded, Darrow stepped up to defend the Black family.

This was going to be a trial that would stun America.

Screenshot from Darrow (1991) Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

38. He Changed The World

While there had been 11 people in that house that day, it was Ossian Sweet, a doctor, and three of his family members who were on trial. Clarence Darrow had another speech ready, and it lasted for seven long hours. It was vital for the civil rights movement, and it landed Darrow in the book Speeches that Changed the World. It was also vital for Ossian and his family members. They all walked away with their freedom.

Darrow’s next case would see him defending someone very different.

Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced  Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

39. There Was A Case in Hawaii

In 1932, an interesting case came across Darrow’s desk. A socialist named Grace Fortescue, who lived in Hawaii, had taken the law into her own hands. You see, a man had forcefully violated Fortescue’s daughter, and a trial had not found the suspect in the case guilty. There was going to be a retrial, but Fortescue couldn't wait. She gathered together a small team and decided to force Joseph Kahahawai Jr to confess.

What happened next brought Darrow to the case.

Grace Fortescue, American socialiteHarris & Ewing, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

40. It Wasn’t His Usual Type Of Case

Sadly, Fortescue and her helpers went too far, and Kahahawai didn’t survive the ordeal. Because Kahahawai was Hawaiian and Fortescue was white, this case was another charged event. But this time, Clarence Darrow wouldn’t be defending the underdog; he would be on the side of the wealthy Fortescue.

It didn’t sound like the sort of case Darrow would take, but he did, and he had his reasons.

Screenshot from Darrow (1991) Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

41. He Went South

At this time, Darrow was 68 and feeling the need for retirement. But the Depression had wiped out his finances, and he simply needed money. The offer to defend Fortescue was too good to give up, and Darrow made his way to Hawaii. He was going to be at the center of another outrageous trial.

Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced  Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

42. He Had A Plan

Since officers had caught Fortescue and her abettors with the body of Kahahwai, there was little doubt about her guilt. Once again, Clarence Darrow was working on making sure the sentence for his client was not too lengthy. Darrow’s tactic was to frame the macabre incident as a necessary stage in the family’s effort to preserve their honor.

Most Americans thought that this was the right way to look at it. But they were forgetting one simple fact.

Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced  Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

43. He Knew What He Had To Do

The thing was, no one was sure that Kahahawai was guilty of the original assault. In fact, there was evidence that Kahahawai could not have been where it occurred because he was in a car accident in another part of the island. Darrow didn’t seem to consider this at all. He knew what his job was: to keep Fortescue from ending up behind bars.

Well, he did his job and then some.

Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced  Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

44. He Was A Celebrity

Much like the 1995 OJ Simpson case, Americans were on edge to find out which way this case would go. In Hawaii, they feared a race riot and considered imposing martial law. Darrow, in true form, had prepared a four and a half hour speech for his closing arguments. He was now so well-known that they broadcast his oration across America.

In just 48 hours, the jury came back with a verdict.

O. J. SimpsonPOOL, Getty Images

Advertisement

45. He Had Succeeded

Clarnece Darrow had done his job well. The verdict came back with the lesser charge of manslaughter, and a recommendation that the judge be lenient on Fortescue and her accomplices. In Hawaii, courts normally imposed ten years of hard labor as punishment. It was tense in Hawaii, as white citizens were angry, and it seemed that they would take to the streets in protest.

Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced  Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

46. He Quickly Left

To avoid a riot, the Navy put pressure on the Governor of Hawaii to reduce the sentences of not just Fortescue but also her accomplices. They each served just one hour, and it wasn't behind bars but in the Governor's office. Darrow quickly left the island, which was descending into a chaos that he had helped create.

This was Darrow’s final major trial, but he was still planning for the future.

Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced  Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

47. He Planned For the Afterlife

In March 1938, Clarence Darrow knew that he was not long for this world. The story goes that he made plans in case there was an afterlife. He said if there was an afterlife, he would appear on a bridge in Chicago on the exact date of his last day alive. This plan seems strange for a man who did not believe in an afterlife.

As it turned out, Darrow was playing a macabre joke.

Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced  Screenshot from Darrow, Arrow Film Distributors (1991), Enhanced

Advertisement

48. He Didn’t Return

Apparently, Darrow only promised to go to the bridge in the afterlife to prevent so-called mediums from pretending to talk to him from beyond the grave. He passed on March 13, 1938, and no one has claimed to see him on the bridge. It’s not surprising, as Darrow had very little belief in things like god and the afterlife.

Screenshot from Compulsion (1959) Screenshot from Compulsion (1959) Screenshot from Compulsion, 20th Century-Fox (1959)

Advertisement

49. He Questioned Religion

In 1929, Clarence Darrow went against public opinion and made a speech declaring that he was an agnostic. He even said that he “questioned the doctrines of Christianity and the Bible”. In 1931, he went head-to-head with English writer GK Chesterton on the topic “Will the World Return to Religion?”. Unlike his court appearances, he lost this debate by a mile.

While Darrow didn't believe in things like god or the afterlife, he does have a way of living forever.

US lawyer Clarence Seward Darrow (1857 - 1938), right, defence lawyer in the John Scopes case, in which a Tennessee teacher was charged for teaching the theory of evolution in 1925. Darrow also acted in several labour issue cases and championed the underprivileged. US Library of CongressKeystone, Getty Images

Advertisement

50. He Has An Afterlife

While Clarence Darrow may be gone forever, he lives on in popular culture. Darrow, or some version of him, has appeared in plays, movies, and on TV. Orson Welles played a version of Darrow in 1959’s Compulsion. Kevin Spacey played him in a 1991 episode of American Playhouse. Some believe that Spencer Tracy was the actor who best portrayed a fictionalized version of Darrow in 1960. He received an Academy Award nomination for taking on the role in Inherit the Wind. 

Screenshot from Compulsion, 20th Century-Fox  (1959) Screenshot from Compulsion, 20th Century-Fox (1959)

Advertisement

You May Also Like:

Wild Facts About Charles Lindbergh, The First Celebrity Aviator

The Twinkie Defense: The Absurd Legal Defense Used (Somewhat Successfully) To Get Away With Murder

Extravagant Facts About Gloria Vanderbilt, The All-American Heiress

Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19


More from Factinate

More from Factinate




Dear reader,


Want to tell us to write facts on a topic? We’re always looking for your input! Please reach out to us to let us know what you’re interested in reading. Your suggestions can be as general or specific as you like, from “Life” to “Compact Cars and Trucks” to “A Subspecies of Capybara Called Hydrochoerus Isthmius.” We’ll get our writers on it because we want to create articles on the topics you’re interested in. Please submit feedback to hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your time!


Do you question the accuracy of a fact you just read? At Factinate, we’re dedicated to getting things right. Our credibility is the turbo-charged engine of our success. We want our readers to trust us. Our editors are instructed to fact check thoroughly, including finding at least three references for each fact. However, despite our best efforts, we sometimes miss the mark. When we do, we depend on our loyal, helpful readers to point out how we can do better. Please let us know if a fact we’ve published is inaccurate (or even if you just suspect it’s inaccurate) by reaching out to us at hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your help!


Warmest regards,



The Factinate team




Want to learn something new every day?

Join thousands of others and start your morning with our Fact Of The Day newsletter.

Thank you!

Error, please try again.