Medical Treatments Once Hailed As Breakthroughs Until Everything Went Wrong

Medical Treatments Once Hailed As Breakthroughs Until Everything Went Wrong

Medicine Has Had Some Terrifying Wrong Turns

Some of medicine’s biggest mistakes didn't begin as obvious quackery. They were developed by respected doctors, embraced by hospitals, and celebrated as major breakthroughs before the risks became impossible to ignore. A few even won Nobel Prizes before later generations looked back and wondered how they were ever considered good medicine.  

1960s nurse adjusting dosage injection hypodermic needle Dream Media, Getty Images

Advertisement

Doctors Thought Lobotomies Could Transform Psychiatry

In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz developed the prefrontal leucotomy, an operation intended to relieve severe psychiatric symptoms by cutting connections in the frontal lobes. At a time when doctors had few effective treatments for serious mental illness, the procedure seemed revolutionary. Versions of the operation soon spread well beyond Portugal. 

Original caption:Photography Harris A Ewing, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Idea Won Medicine's Biggest Prize

The medical establishment did not simply tolerate Moniz's work. In 1949, he shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for what the Nobel committee described as the therapeutic value of leucotomy in certain psychoses. The award shows just how seriously the procedure was regarded at the time.

Nobel prize winner Egas MonizUnknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Walter Freeman Took It Much Further

American neurologist Walter Freeman became one of lobotomy's most aggressive promoters. He helped popularize the procedure in the United States and later championed the transorbital technique, which reached the brain through the eye socket. Freeman personally performed more than 3,000 prefrontal and transorbital lobotomies during his career.

Dr. Walter Freeman, left, and Dr. James W. Watts study an X ray before a psychosurgical operation. Psychosurgery is cutting into the brain to form new patterns and rid a patient of delusions, obsessions, nervous tensions and the like. Photography Harris A Ewing, Wikimedia Commons, Enhanced

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

The Damage Became Impossible To Ignore

Lobotomy could leave patients with profound personality and behavioral changes, while complications included epilepsy, bleeding, disability, and death. One historical review of more than 10,000 prefrontal lobotomies reported a mortality rate of about six percent. As psychiatric medications became available in the 1950s, use of the operation declined sharply. 

Lobotoomia töövahendid Trondheimi justiitsmuuseumis. 2015. aasta oktooberSillerkiil, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Insulin Was Turned Into A Psychiatric Treatment

In 1933, Austrian psychiatrist Manfred Sakel reported promising results from deliberately giving large doses of insulin to people with schizophrenia. The goal was to lower blood sugar until patients became unconscious. Insulin coma therapy quickly spread through psychiatric hospitals in Europe and North America.

Insulin shock therapy performed by unnamed nurses on an unnamed patient. Source indicates that it was shot around the year 1930, however, as results of the procedure were first made public in 1933, and the practice wasn't widespread until a few years afteUnknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Patients Were Deliberately Put Into Comas

A typical treatment involved inducing profound hypoglycemia and keeping a patient unconscious before administering glucose to end the coma. Convulsions could occur, and some patients failed to regain consciousness normally. Contemporary medical literature documented prolonged coma, neurological problems, brain injury, and occasional deaths. 

A nurse at the Horace Berk Memorial Hospital prepare an insulin injection for the treatment of insanity, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, March 28, 1938. Dr Manfre Sakel of Vienna discovered three years ago that an 'insulin shot shock treatment' causes the body to burn its sugar, depriving the brain of its sole source of energy and often induces violent shock which frequently affects a complete cure of the mental ailment.Underwood Archives, Getty Images

Advertisement

Better Studies Undermined The Whole Idea

Despite its rapid adoption, doctors had questioned the evidence behind insulin coma therapy almost from the beginning. More rigorous trials during the 1950s failed to support the dramatic benefits that enthusiasts had claimed. The treatment was largely abandoned by the 1960s, leaving behind a striking example of medical enthusiasm outrunning convincing evidence. 

A nurse checks on a psychiatric patient who lies in a state of insulin-induced coma. To break the coma, a dose of sugar is administered.Hulton Deutsch, Getty Images

Advertisement

Then There Was The Treatment That Gave Patients Malaria

Neurosyphilis was once a devastating disease that could cause severe neurological and psychiatric symptoms. In 1917, Austrian physician Julius Wagner-Jauregg began deliberately infecting patients with malaria in an attempt to treat it. The resulting high fevers were believed to combat the underlying syphilitic infection.

AUSTRIA - CIRCA 1900: Auditorium filled with students at a lecture of Julius Wagner-Jauregg, physician and psychiatrist, who became famous for his treatment of mental disease by inducing a fever, which earned him the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1927. Vienna. Photograph. Aroundbrandstaetter images, Getty Images

Advertisement

Malaria Therapy Won A Nobel Prize Too

Wagner-Jauregg's method became one of the most celebrated medical treatments of its era. In 1927, he received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for discovering the therapeutic value of malaria inoculation in treating what was then called dementia paralytica. Malaria therapy went on to be used in psychiatric hospitals in several parts of the world.

Dr. Julius Wagner-Jauregg (1857-1940) Austria. Nobel Prize in Medicine 1927 for his research into g.p.j. in Malaria.Unknown author, Wikimedia Commons, Enhanced

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

Penicillin Made The Risk Harder To Justify

Doctors could attempt to stop the induced malaria with quinine after treatment, but intentionally giving a dangerous infectious disease to sick patients was hardly harmless. Later historical research has also questioned how strong the original evidence for the therapy really was. Once penicillin became an effective treatment for syphilis, malaria therapy rapidly became obsolete.

La fabrication du premier antibiotique, la pénicilline 
photographie issue de l’exposition du Palais de la  Découverte intitulée La pénicilline, 1946. 19900512/29Archives nationales (France), Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Radium Was Once Treated Like A Medical Miracle

After radium was discovered around the turn of the 20th century, doctors began experimenting with its medical potential. Radiation did have legitimate uses, particularly against certain tumors, but enthusiasm quickly spread far beyond cancer treatment. Radium was promoted for everything from joint pain and skin problems to fatigue and general poor health.

Germany: Radium in preparation for radiotherapy - Photographer: Herbert Hoffmann - Published by: 'B.Z.' 21.09.1934. Vintage property of ullstein bild ullstein bild Dtl., Getty Images

Advertisement

Patients Were Even Told To Drink It

The craze eventually produced radioactive medicines and tonics, including bottles of radium-infused water. One famous product, Radithor, contained radium-226 and radium-228 and was advertised for scores of supposed health problems. Hundreds of thousands of bottles were reportedly sold during the late 1920s.

Back in the 1920s, people thought that drinking radium-  and thorium- infused water was healthy. One of the more famous varieties of  this water was sold under the brand name Radithor. It was eventually famously implicated in the illness and subsequent deSam LaRussa from United States of America, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Radiation Stayed Inside The Body

The danger became clearer as scientists learned what radium actually did after entering the body. Because it behaves chemically somewhat like calcium, absorbed radium can accumulate in bones and expose surrounding tissue to radiation over long periods. Cases of severe radium poisoning helped destroy the idea that radioactivity itself was a health tonic and contributed to tighter controls over radioactive medical products.

Radium treatment to cure a nasal infection, France, 20th century. Part of the Marshall Plan mercy mission. The Marshall Plan was a massive programme of US aid for the reconstruction of Europe after the Second World War. Print Collector, Getty Images

Advertisement

Sulfa Drugs Looked Like A Miracle

The arrival of sulfanilamide in the 1930s was genuinely exciting. The drug could successfully treat bacterial infections that had previously been extremely dangerous, and tablet and powder forms had already been used safely. Then one company decided to create a more appealing liquid version.

In 1937, Elixir Sulfanilamide was prescribed to many patients to treat infections, including sore throats. At the time, drug manufacturers were not required to prove the safety of their drugs prior to marketing. Elixir contained diethylene glycol, a highlThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The New Liquid Had A Deadly Ingredient

S.E. Massengill Company dissolved sulfanilamide in diethylene glycol, a toxic chemical related to substances used in antifreeze. The company tested the mixture for qualities such as taste and appearance but did not conduct toxicity testing before distributing it. At the time, American law did not require manufacturers to prove a new drug's safety before selling it. 

The Massengill Company marketed Elixir Sulfanilamide in 1937 using diethylene glycol, a chemical analogue of antifreeze, as a solvent for the recently discovered systemic treatment for infections. The toxic product resulted in the deaths of more than 100,FDA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

More Than 100 People Died

Elixir Sulfanilamide killed more than 100 people across the United States in 1937, many of them children. The disaster exposed huge gaps in federal drug regulation and helped push Congress toward the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The new law required manufacturers to demonstrate the safety of new drugs before marketing them.

Title: Promoted as new federal food, drug, and cosmetic act goes into effect. Washington, D.C., Aug. 29. Joseph Caliway, Jr., now Chief Chemist of the Eastern Food and Drug Inspection District with headquarters in New York, has been transferred to WashingHarris & Ewing, photographer, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

DES Promised To Protect Pregnancies

Beginning around 1940, doctors prescribed the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol, better known as DES, to pregnant women. It was thought to reduce miscarriages, premature labor, and other pregnancy complications. Millions of pregnant women received the drug before the practice ended. 

OsloMetXOsloMetX, Pixabay

Advertisement

Evidence Against It Appeared Early

By the 1950s, studies had already shown that DES was not effective at preventing the pregnancy problems for which it was being prescribed. Yet its use during pregnancy continued for years. Then researchers discovered a far more disturbing problem involving the daughters of women who had taken it. 

Scientist conducting a laboratory experiment in a cancer research facility in the United States, 1951.Everett Collection, Shutterstock

Advertisement

The Consequences Appeared In The Next Generation

In 1971, researchers connected prenatal DES exposure with a rare form of cervical cancer in young women. Other reproductive and health problems were subsequently identified among people exposed to DES before birth. The FDA soon advised doctors to stop prescribing it to pregnant women, turning DES into a landmark warning about effects that may take decades to emerge.

A woman sitting indoors holding a pillow against her stomach, indicating discomfort or painSora Shimazaki, Pexels

Thalidomide Looked Remarkably Safe

Thalidomide appeared in the late 1950s as a non-barbiturate sedative and was promoted as unusually safe. It was sold in dozens of countries and prescribed for conditions including insomnia and nausea during pregnancy. In Britain, doctors also gave it to pregnant women suffering from morning sickness. 

In 1960, the FDA received a new drug application for a sedative, thalidomide, used for years in other countries to treat a variety of maladies, including morning sickness. FDA medical officer Frances Oldham Kelsey refused to approve the application for laThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Birth Defects Were Catastrophic

When thalidomide was taken during a critical period early in pregnancy, it could interfere with fetal development. Thousands of children worldwide were born with serious impairments involving limbs, hearing, sight, the face, or internal organs. The connection eventually led to the drug's withdrawal in countries where it had been widely sold.

LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM - OCTOBER 12: At Chailey Heritage House, Mrs Hoare With Young Victims Of Thalidomide Born With Malformations Or Neither Arms Nor Legs, in London, United Kingdom, on October 12, 1962. Keystone-France, Getty Images

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

One FDA Reviewer Refused To Approve It

The United States largely escaped the scale of the European disaster because FDA medical officer Frances Oldham Kelsey repeatedly refused to approve thalidomide. She believed the manufacturer had not supplied adequate evidence of safety despite pressure to clear the application. By late 1961, reports from overseas were confirming the severe risks she had worried about.

Dr. Frances O. Kelsey, pictured here in the 1960s, spent most of her career at FDA overseeing scientific investigations of drugs.

For more information about FDA history visit www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WhatWeDo/History/default.htmThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Thalidomide Changed Drug Regulation

The tragedy helped build support for the 1962 Kefauver-Harris Drug Amendments in the United States. Manufacturers were now required to provide substantial evidence that new drugs were effective as well as safe before marketing them. Thalidomide itself later found legitimate uses for certain conditions under strict controls, making its history more complicated than a simple story of a permanently abandoned drug.

After signing the Kefauver-Harris Drug Amendments on October 10, 1962, President Kennedy presented a pen to those observing the momentous event, including Dr. Frances O. Kelsey.

For more information about FDA history visit www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WhatWeDo/HThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Fen-Phen Became A Weight-Loss Sensation

In the 1990s, the combination of fenfluramine and phentermine became enormously popular as a treatment for obesity. Although the combination itself was not FDA-approved, doctors could prescribe the individually approved drugs together. More than 18 million prescriptions for fenfluramine and phentermine were filled in the United States in 1996 alone.

Pills & bottles of fenfluramine & phentermine, A.K.A fen/phen, diet pills.Allan Tannenbaum, Getty Images

Advertisement

Doctors Began Seeing Damaged Heart Valves

In 1997, physicians reported an unusual pattern of heart-valve disease among women who had taken fen-phen. A widely discussed New England Journal of Medicine report described 24 women with abnormal valve findings, with several also developing pulmonary hypertension. Additional reports quickly strengthened concerns that the drugs were associated with serious cardiovascular harm. 

Doctor discusses health records with a patient in a clinical setting.RDNE Stock project, Pexels

Advertisement

The Phenomenon Collapsed Almost Overnight

On September 15, 1997, fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine were withdrawn from the U.S. market over concerns about valvular heart disease and pulmonary hypertension. Phentermine itself was not part of that withdrawal. The episode became another warning about how quickly a widely adopted treatment can unravel once uncommon or delayed harms become visible.

Black and white photo of a man clutching his chest, indicating discomfort or pain.freestocks.org, Pexels

Advertisement

Today's Breakthroughs Face A Higher Bar

These treatments came from very different eras, so their stories are not identical. Some addressed diseases for which doctors had almost no alternatives, while others exposed failures in testing, regulation, or the interpretation of weak evidence. Together, they helped shape the modern expectation that medical treatments must be tested not only for immediate promise, but also for safety, effectiveness, and harms that may take years to appear. 

Penicillin Past, Present and Future- the Development and Production of Penicillin, England, 1943
A laboratory worker measures purified penicillin into ampoules or bottles.  It is then freeze-dried and the ice evaporated off under vacuum.  At the end of thRichard Stone, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

You May Also Like: 

The Coney Island Incubator Babies Were Put On Display, But The Spectacle Actually Saved Lives

Bizarre Things That People Somehow Once Believed Were Good For Their Health

Popular Historical Medical Procedures That Caused More Harm Than What They Were Supposed To Cure

Sources:  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14


More from Factinate

More from Factinate




Dear reader,


Want to tell us to write facts on a topic? We’re always looking for your input! Please reach out to us to let us know what you’re interested in reading. Your suggestions can be as general or specific as you like, from “Life” to “Compact Cars and Trucks” to “A Subspecies of Capybara Called Hydrochoerus Isthmius.” We’ll get our writers on it because we want to create articles on the topics you’re interested in. Please submit feedback to hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your time!


Do you question the accuracy of a fact you just read? At Factinate, we’re dedicated to getting things right. Our credibility is the turbo-charged engine of our success. We want our readers to trust us. Our editors are instructed to fact check thoroughly, including finding at least three references for each fact. However, despite our best efforts, we sometimes miss the mark. When we do, we depend on our loyal, helpful readers to point out how we can do better. Please let us know if a fact we’ve published is inaccurate (or even if you just suspect it’s inaccurate) by reaching out to us at hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your help!


Warmest regards,



The Factinate team




Want to learn something new every day?

Join thousands of others and start your morning with our Fact Of The Day newsletter.

Thank you!

Error, please try again.