Theoretical physicist claims NASA changed Apollo Moon photos to hide “aliens”.

Theoretical physicist claims NASA changed Apollo Moon photos to hide “aliens”.

Something Strange in the Sky

NASA’s Apollo astronauts brought back Moon rocks, scientific data and thousands of photographs that have been studied for more than half a century. You would think there would be very few surprises left hiding in them.

But a theoretical physicist says two versions of the same Apollo image contain one enormous difference—and he believes someone wanted it gone.

astronaut on the moonFactinate

Advertisement

This Was Not a NASA Announcement

Despite some of the headlines surrounding the story, this was not a confession from NASA or one of the agency’s scientists. The allegations were made by theoretical physicist Maaneli “Max” Derakhshani during an appearance on Jesse Michels’ American Alchemy podcast. However, the guy has serious credentials.

a few people in space suitsMario Verduzco, Unsplash

Advertisement

His Credentials

Derakhshani has a PhD in theoretical physics and has conducted academic research at Utrecht University and Rutgers. His work has focused largely on quantum physics, gravity and the philosophy of science. In other words, he is not simply someone who spotted a blurry dot online and immediately called it an alien.

Earth Simulation Lab, voorheen Robert J. van de Graafflaboratorium, aan de Princetonlaan in Utrecht.Choinowski, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

But He Is Not a NASA Whistleblower

Derakhshani never worked on the Apollo missions, handled the original flight film or witnessed anyone altering photographs. His argument comes from comparing images found in different public archives and claiming the differences between them are too significant to be blamed on ordinary processing.

At 9:32 a.m. EDT, the swing arms move away and a plume of flame signals the liftoff of the Apollo 11 Saturn V space vehicle and astronauts Neil A. Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edwin E. Aldrin, Jr. from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A.NASA; restored by Michel Vuijlsteke, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

It Begins With Apollo 14

Apollo 14 launched on January 31, 1971, and became NASA’s third successful crewed Moon landing. Alan Shepard and Edgar Mitchell explored the Fra Mauro region while Stuart Roosa remained in lunar orbit. It was a successful mission—but one photograph associated with it has now become the centre of a much stranger story.

The Apollo 11 lunar landing mission crew, pictured from left to right, Neil A. Armstrong, commander; Michael Collins, command module pilot; and Edwin E. Aldrin Jr., lunar module pilot.NASA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Edgar Mitchell Was Standing in the Frame

The disputed image shows Mitchell working on the lunar surface. He was the sixth person to walk on the Moon, and the photograph is one of thousands of Apollo images that have been copied, rescanned and placed in different archives over the decades. However, the reports surrounding Derakhshani’s claim do not clearly provide the frame’s official Apollo identification number.

Shepard and Mitchell on the moon during Apollo 14 mission.NASA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

One Version Shows an Empty Sky

According to the comparison Derakhshani presented, one version of the photograph appears in the Lunar and Planetary Institute’s Apollo Image Atlas. In that reproduction, the sky above Mitchell looks completely black. There are no stars, no mysterious lights and certainly nothing that immediately looks like it arrived from somewhere else.

Apollo 14, Alan B. Shepard Jr. on Lunar surface.Edgar D. Mitchell / NASA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Then He Pulls Up Another Copy

Derakhshani says a newer scan of the same exposure appears in another Apollo collection created from Johnson Space Center scans. This time, something is visible in the darkness above Mitchell. It is small, noticeably blue and missing from the version he showed immediately before it.

Apollo 14 Commander Alan Shepard stands by the Modular Equipment Transporter (MET).  The MET, which the astronauts nicknamed theNASA Edgar Mitchell, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Blue Orb Changes Everything

To Derakhshani, this is not just a slightly brighter pixel or a mark revealed by adjusting the photograph. He describes it as a distinct blue orb. More importantly, he says it appears in one archived reproduction of the frame but seems to be completely absent from the other.

Frame from Al's 12 o'clock pan showing Ed doing a TV pan and, in the distance, considerable detail of the Cone Crater ridge. We can see Ed's footprints leading out to the TV site. As is usual for soil disturbances near the LM, the soil along Ed's track isNASA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

He Does Not Think It Was an Accident

Derakhshani argues that the object does not resemble an ordinary lens flare, speck of dust or random film defect. He believes someone deliberately removed it from one version of the photograph—and that the apparent change may have been part of a wider effort to clean unexplained objects out of Apollo imagery.

Lunar Module Pilot Edgar Mitchell lays out the geophone line on Apollo 14.NASA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

There Is One Major Problem

Because the exact official frame number is not clearly identified in the reports, the comparison is difficult for outsiders to check independently. Readers are being shown Derakhshani’s presentation of two images, but there has not yet been a published technical analysis confirming that they are the same exposure, processed from comparable source material.

S71-19509 (5 Feb. 1971) --- Astronaut Edgar D. Mitchell, lunar module pilot, operates the Active Seismic Experiment's (ASE) thumper during the first Apollo 14 extravehicular activity (EVA) on the moon. Astronaut Alan B. Shepard Jr., commander, walks near NASA Johnson Space Center, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Photograph Has Had Several Lives

Apollo photographs now exist in several forms. Some older digital images were made from duplicate film several generations removed from the originals, while newer scans were created directly from NASA’s protected flight film. Those different sources can produce noticeably different results before anyone even begins adjusting contrast or colour.

AS14-64-9140 (6 Feb. 1971) --- Astronaut Edgar D. Mitchell, lunar module pilot, participates in the mission's second extravehicular activity (EVA). He is standing near the modularized equipment transporter (MET). While astronauts Alan B. Shepard Jr., commNASA Johnson Space Center, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Different Scans Can Reveal Different Things

Differences in film generation, exposure, colour processing, compression and scanning quality could potentially explain why a faint mark appears in one reproduction but not another. However, no independent image analysis has yet established what caused this particular blue object—or whether it was present on the original exposure at all.

Apollo 14's LRRR.
A close-up view of the laser ranging retro reflector (LR3) which the Apollo 14 astronauts deployed on the moon during their lunar surface extravehicular activity (EVA). While astronauts Alan B. Shepard Jr., commander, and Edgar D. MitcheNASA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

NASA Really Has Changed Some Apollo Images

Here is the part that gives Derakhshani’s accusation a little extra oxygen. NASA and the Lunar and Planetary Institute openly acknowledge that some Apollo panoramas were digitally assembled from several frames. During that process, sections of sky and visible lens flares were sometimes removed so the photographs could be blended together cleanly.

Apollo 14 - Station B1 Pan - Images AS14-64-9075 to 9097NASA/Alan Shepherd/Edgar Mitchell, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

But Those Changes Were Not Secret

Those edits were made to stitched panoramic images and were openly documented. That is very different from secretly removing an unexplained object from a single Apollo photograph. It proves that NASA processed some images for presentation—but it does not prove the agency erased evidence of aliens.

The seventh group of NASA astronauts, selected in 1969 after the cancellation of the Air Force's Manned Orbiting Laboratory project. The astronauts are, from left to right, USAF Major Karol J. Bobko, USAF Major C. Gordon Fullerton, USAF Major Henry W. HarNASA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Apollo 17 Adds More Lights

Derakhshani also points to an Apollo 17 image that he says contains three blue lights above the lunar landscape. When the photograph is brightened, he believes a faint shape becomes visible between them, suggesting the lights may all belong to one much larger object hidden against the black sky.

Panorama view of Apollo 17 lunar surface photos for Station 1 at the Taurus-Littrow landing site taken during the first moonwalk of the mission by Apollo 17 commander Eugene Cernan and lunar module pilot Harrison (Jack) Schmitt. Harrison H.NASA on The Commons, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

There Are Less Exciting Explanations

Film damage, reflections, scanning defects and cosmic rays can all leave bright spots or streaks in space photographs. Once those marks are enlarged and enhanced, they can look surprisingly solid. Derakhshani is not convinced, arguing that the lights appear too round and too regularly arranged to be dismissed so easily. But that remains his interpretation.

Apollo 17 mission, 12 December 1972.
Astronaut Eugene A. Cernan, commander, makes a short checkout of the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) during the early part of the first Apollo 17 Extravehicular Activity (EVA-1) at the Taurus-Littrow landing site. This viewNASA / Harrison H. Schmitt, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Then Comes the Destroyed-Photo Story

Derakhshani also cites Ken Johnston Sr., a former Apollo-era contractor who says he was ordered to destroy several sets of Apollo photographic prints but kept one. Some retellings describe original negatives, but Johnston’s own account refers to 8-by-10-inch glossy prints. No verified order shows they were marked for destruction because they contained evidence of aliens or unexplained structures.

Apollo 17 mission, 12 December 1972. Astronaut Eugene A. Cernan, commander, makes a short checkout of the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) during the early part of the first Apollo 17 Extravehicular Activity (EVA-1) at the Taurus-Littrow landing site.NASA / Harrison H. Schmitt, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Buzz Aldrin Gave a Simpler Answer

The Apollo 11 crew really did report seeing an unidentified object while travelling toward the Moon. That detail has fuelled speculation for decades. Buzz Aldrin later said it was probably one of the panels discarded when the spacecraft separated from part of its launch vehicle. His conclusion was far less mysterious: it was not an alien craft.

Astronaut Edwin E. Aldrin, Jr.NASA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Edgar Mitchell Was Open to the Unexplained

Mitchell secretly conducted an extrasensory-perception experiment during Apollo 14 and later became deeply interested in consciousness, UFOs and claims of extraterrestrial encounters. That makes his presence in the disputed photograph especially intriguing. However, there is no verified statement from Mitchell identifying the blue object above him as an alien spacecraft.

Peter-LomasPeter-Lomas, Pixabay

Apollo Did Not End Because of Aliens

The United States stopped sending astronauts to the Moon after Apollo 17, but the historical explanation is much less dramatic. NASA’s budget was being reduced, additional Apollo missions were cancelled and the government shifted its attention toward projects including the Space Shuttle. There is no credible evidence the program ended because astronauts encountered something on the Moon.

NASA Jet Propulsion Lab (USDA Forest service photo by Andrew Avitt)Pacific Southwest Forest Service, USDA from USA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

NASA Says It Has Found No Alien Evidence

NASA’s public position remains that it has found no credible evidence of extraterrestrial life or proof that unexplained objects seen in photographs are alien vehicles. The agency acknowledges that some observations cannot be immediately identified, but says the usual problem is incomplete or unreliable data.

Megan Cruz, of NASA Communications, moderates a press conference after the first launch attempt of NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test was scrubbed for the day, Monday, May 6, 2024, at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test is tNASA HQ PHOTO, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

So What Does the Photograph Actually Prove?

At the moment, it proves that Derakhshani found what he believes are two noticeably different reproductions of an Apollo photograph. It may also show a real photographic anomaly worthy of closer examination. What it does not prove is that the blue object was an alien craft—or that NASA deliberately removed it.

Buzz Aldrin on the moon in front of the US flagNASA, Unsplash

Advertisement

A Fascinating Claim, Not a Discovery

Derakhshani has found something strange enough to make people stop scrolling and look twice. But the leap from a blue mark in an old photograph to a decades-long alien cover-up is enormous. Until the exact frame is identified and the archival scans are compared by independent imaging experts, this remains an intriguing allegation—not evidence that Apollo astronauts encountered aliens.

WikiImagesWikiImages, Pixabay

Advertisement

You Might Also Like:

NASA has determined the exact date when an asteroid with the power of 22 atomic bombs could hit Earth.

Ancient DNA from Colombia revealed a previously unknown human population that lived 6,000 years ago—then completely vanished from the genetic record.

Sources: 1, 2, 3


More from Factinate

More from Factinate




Dear reader,


Want to tell us to write facts on a topic? We’re always looking for your input! Please reach out to us to let us know what you’re interested in reading. Your suggestions can be as general or specific as you like, from “Life” to “Compact Cars and Trucks” to “A Subspecies of Capybara Called Hydrochoerus Isthmius.” We’ll get our writers on it because we want to create articles on the topics you’re interested in. Please submit feedback to hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your time!


Do you question the accuracy of a fact you just read? At Factinate, we’re dedicated to getting things right. Our credibility is the turbo-charged engine of our success. We want our readers to trust us. Our editors are instructed to fact check thoroughly, including finding at least three references for each fact. However, despite our best efforts, we sometimes miss the mark. When we do, we depend on our loyal, helpful readers to point out how we can do better. Please let us know if a fact we’ve published is inaccurate (or even if you just suspect it’s inaccurate) by reaching out to us at hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your help!


Warmest regards,



The Factinate team




Want to learn something new every day?

Join thousands of others and start your morning with our Fact Of The Day newsletter.

Thank you!

Error, please try again.