Researchers analyzed DNA samples that proved the Huns were directly related to a nomadic empire that dominated the steppes of Mongolia.

Researchers analyzed DNA samples that proved the Huns were directly related to a nomadic empire that dominated the steppes of Mongolia.

Recent DNA analysis from remains excavated at sites in Hungary's Carpathian Basin has cracked open the mystery of the origins of the Huns, linking them directly to the Xiongnu empire. The history-shattering study examined remains dated from the 2nd century BC–6th century AD. The study documents direct genetic links between elite Xiongnu individuals and the Huns who swept across Eurasian steppes into Europe in the days of the Roman Empire.

A Breathtaking Discovery

Diggings at sites in China found elite burials that held both Xiongnu‑style artifacts and the telltale signs of early Hunnic activities. DNA samples were extracted from remains spanning several centuries. Researchers sequenced genomes from 370 individuals: Xiongnu elites (Mongolia, 2nd century BC–1st century AD), Central Asian specimens (2nd–5th century AD), and Hun burials in the Carpathian Basin (5th–6th century AD).

File:Hunnen.jpgPeter Johann Nepomuk Geiger, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Genetic Links To Mongol Forerunners

The DNA results show that some European Huns carried genes identical to those in Xiongnu elite individuals, this is real evidence of direct descent. It suggests that a subset of the European Hun elite were biological descendants of elite Xiongnu, keeping a continuous aristocratic lineage as they plundered their way westward across Eurasia.

Incredible Genetic Diversity

Despite this elite lineage, the majority of Hun‑period individuals in Europe show a wide range of ancestries. Many carried predominantly West Eurasian or Sarmatian genetic markers, with only a minority displaying East Asian ancestry. This makes sense, since the Hun armies and populations were diverse coalitions of steppe nomads, Iranian‑steppe groups, and local European peoples.

Clues In Spoken Words

In addition to the DNA study, linguistic research pinpointed links between Hunnic and Xiongnu languages. Scholars propose both spoke Old Arin, a Yeniseian language, challenging earlier theories that they were Turkic or Mongolic. Shared loanwords for natural objects and similar name structures all show language ties along with the shared genetics.

Huns01New Archaeology Discoveries: March 2025 - SAR Pyramid Scan | Karnak Treasure | Silk Road Princess, Inside Archaeology, YouTube

Advertisement

DNA Helps Trace The Twisting Path Of Migration

The data indicate westward migration: Xiongnu elites mixed with Iranian Saka groups in Central Asia, migrated through the Tian Shan region, and eventually made their way into Europe. As they traveled west like an inexorable tide, they absorbed local peoples. This fits with Iron‑Age genetic samples in Xinjiang that demonstrate a melting pot of Eastern and Western ancestry.

Turkic Origins Uprooted

Many older theories assumed that the Huns were descended from Turkic groups, but this new genetic and linguistic evidence overturns that hypothesis. Instead, the Huns seem to have been a complex, multi‑ethnic, multi‑linguistic background rooted in earlier Inner Asian steppe societies. It confirms historian Edward Gibbon’s original argument back in the 1700s that the Hun were directly related to the Xiongnu.

Separate Royal Bloodlines

Within the Xiongnu empire, high‑status people displayed more homogeneous East‑Asian‑derived ancestry. Lower‑status people were far more genetically diverse. The elite genetic profile seems to have carried into the Hun elite, generally supporting a ruling class continuity.

Huns02New Archaeology Discoveries: March 2025 - SAR Pyramid Scan | Karnak Treasure | Silk Road Princess, Inside Archaeology, YouTube

Advertisement

Cauldrons And Cranial Deformation

Archaeological evidence also highlights cultural continuities, such as similar bronze cauldrons and the bizarre practice of artificial cranial deformation found both among the Xiongnu and European Huns. Though it’s possible that cranial deformation spread separately, the material artifacts reinforce an absolutely unmistakable cultural bridge.

Early Medieval Eurasia: More Diverse Origins

The DNA doesn’t lie. All of these findings make it crystal clear that the Huns weren’t a monolithic tribe as we previously thought. They were an ethnically diverse force with aristocratic roots stretching back to the Xiongnu. Their irresistible westward expansion is an example of how dynastic lineages shaped Eurasian history by cultural diffusion and military conquest.

File:Huns by Rochegrosse 1910.jpgGeorges Rochegrosse, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

Research Shifting Into High Gear

Though the research on Hun genetics has come a long way, the drive to discover more is far from over. Archaeologists want to refine the temporal links between sites, regional genetic variation, and plunge deeper into comparative studies of material culture and language. Gathering together all this exciting information should tell us a lot more about the complex origins of the Huns who ravaged Europe all those centuries ago.

You May Also Like:

Explorers uncovered a 3,600-year-old Egyptian tomb belonging to a mysterious long-lost dynasty.

Historical "Truths" That We Got So Wrong

History's Most Mysterious "Out Of Place" Artifacts

Sources:  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8


More from Factinate

More from Factinate




Dear reader,


Want to tell us to write facts on a topic? We’re always looking for your input! Please reach out to us to let us know what you’re interested in reading. Your suggestions can be as general or specific as you like, from “Life” to “Compact Cars and Trucks” to “A Subspecies of Capybara Called Hydrochoerus Isthmius.” We’ll get our writers on it because we want to create articles on the topics you’re interested in. Please submit feedback to hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your time!


Do you question the accuracy of a fact you just read? At Factinate, we’re dedicated to getting things right. Our credibility is the turbo-charged engine of our success. We want our readers to trust us. Our editors are instructed to fact check thoroughly, including finding at least three references for each fact. However, despite our best efforts, we sometimes miss the mark. When we do, we depend on our loyal, helpful readers to point out how we can do better. Please let us know if a fact we’ve published is inaccurate (or even if you just suspect it’s inaccurate) by reaching out to us at hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your help!


Warmest regards,



The Factinate team




Want to learn something new every day?

Join thousands of others and start your morning with our Fact Of The Day newsletter.

Thank you!

Error, please try again.