“Fake News” Stories From History That Newspapers Printed And Everyone Believed

“Fake News” Stories From History That Newspapers Printed And Everyone Believed

Fake News Is Nothing New. 

Long before professional fact-checkers, instant databases, and searchable archives, newspapers routinely raced one another to print astonishing claims that could be difficult, expensive, or impossible to verify quickly. Some hoaxes lasted hours and others survived for decades, but all exposed the same weakness: a fantastic story can travel much faster than the evidence needed to kill it.

Frances Griffiths with FairiesElsie Wright (1901–1988)

Advertisement

The Moon Suddenly Had Bat People

On August 25, 1835, New York's Sun began publishing a six-part series claiming that astronomer Sir John Herschel had made astonishing discoveries on the Moon. Readers were told that a fantastically powerful telescope had revealed lunar landscapes, animals, and winged humanoids. Herschel really was conducting astronomical observations in South Africa, which gave the fiction a convincing foundation. The articles were actually written by Sun journalist Richard Adams Locke.

Sir John Frederick William Herschel. Mezzotint by W. Ward, 1835, after H. W. Pickersgill.

Iconographic Collections
Keywords: portrait prints; mezzotints; John Frederick William HerschelBodhisattwa, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Fake Science Looked Convincingly Real

Locke filled the series with technical details about Herschel's supposed telescope and increasingly spectacular descriptions of lunar life. Smithsonian notes that science was rapidly expanding during this period, leaving the public fascinated by discoveries arriving from distant parts of the world. That atmosphere made even wildly imaginative claims seem just plausible enough. The Sun had effectively disguised science fiction as scientific correspondence.

Title: Lunar animals and other objects Discovered by Sir John Herschel in his observatory at the Cape of Good Hope and copied from sketches in the Edinburgh Journal of Science.Benjamin Henry Day (1810-1889), Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Newspaper Did Not Want The Truth To Ruin It

The Moon stories became a circulation sensation and were reprinted far beyond New York. Smithsonian Libraries reports that the story spread across continents and that the newspaper's owner resisted allowing Locke to expose the trick while public fascination remained profitable. Images of the supposed lunar creatures were produced for eager readers. One of America's earliest mass newspaper hoaxes had demonstrated that disbelief was not nearly as commercially useful as a continuing mystery.

A busy lunar landscape, as depicted in a Welsh edition of the moon series. Note the plume of
smoke issuing from the hut of the biped beavers.

(Frontispiece of Hanes y Lleuad © The British Library Board. All Rights Reserved.)Hanes y Lleuad, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Edgar Allan Poe Sent A Balloon Across The Atlantic

Nine years later, Edgar Allan Poe pulled a remarkably similar stunt in the same newspaper. On April 13, 1844, The Sun issued an extra announcing that aeronaut Monck Mason and several companions had crossed the Atlantic in a balloon in just 75 hours. The article presented detailed specifications of the craft and described the voyage as an enormous scientific triumph. None of it had happened.

Edgar Allan Poe, June 1849. DaguerreotypeUnknown authorUnknown author; Restored by Yann Forget and Adam Cuerden, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Poe Built His Lie Out Of Real Technology

The story worked because transatlantic balloon travel did not seem completely absurd in 1844. Aeronauts had genuinely discussed long-distance flights, and Poe incorporated real figures and contemporary ideas about balloon design into his account. His technical detail made the story appear much more credible than a simple fantasy. Newspapers elsewhere quickly reprinted the supposed breakthrough.

Edgar Allan Poe'sEdgar Allan Poe, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Balloon Came Down Almost Immediately

The Sun withdrew the claim shortly afterward, and Poe later openly referred to the piece as a hoax. Surviving bibliographic records show that newspapers such as the Baltimore Sun had already reprinted it before the deception fully unraveled. The stunt demonstrated how newspaper syndication could spread false information faster than corrections could follow. Poe had discovered that an invented technological breakthrough made excellent breaking news.

Scope and content:  Drawing made from the “Ultima Thule” daguerreotypeMathew Benjamin Brady, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

A Ten-Foot Man Came Out Of The Ground

In October 1869, workers digging a well on a farm in Cardiff, New York, uncovered what appeared to be the petrified body of a gigantic man. The discovery attracted enormous crowds, with visitors paying to inspect the ten-foot figure. Some people interpreted it as evidence that ancient giants described in the Bible had once existed. The supposed fossil quickly became one of America's most famous curiosities.

The Cardiff Giant at the Farmers' Museum in Cooperstown.Martin Lewison from Forest Hills, NY, U.S.A., Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

George Hull Had Buried The Giant Himself

The Cardiff Giant was actually the creation of George Hull, a New York tobacconist who had ordered an enormous block of gypsum carved into human form. He had the figure treated to make it appear aged and then secretly buried it on his cousin William Newell's property. The eventual "discovery" was therefore carefully staged. Hull hoped both to make money and to mock people who accepted literal claims about biblical giants too easily.

My visit to Cooperstown for the 25th Symposium on Baseball and American CultureMartin Lewison from Forest Hills, NY, U.S.A., Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement
F

History's most fascinating stories and darkest secrets, delivered to your inbox daily.

Thank you!
Error, please try again.

Barnum Made A Fake Of The Fake

When businessman David Hannum and his partners refused to sell the giant to P.T. Barnum, Barnum commissioned a replica and promoted his version as genuine. Hannum's group tried to fight back, producing the surreal spectacle of owners of one fake complaining that another fake was fraudulent. Hull eventually confessed in December 1869. By then, newspapers and paying audiences had transformed an intentionally ridiculous sculpture into a national debate over science and belief.

Photograph of P.T. Barnum.Brady-Handy Photograph Collection (Library of Congress), Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Two Prospectors Found America's Impossible Diamond Field

In the early 1870s, Philip Arnold and John Slack appeared in San Francisco with bags containing rough diamonds and other precious stones. They hinted that the gems came from a secret Western deposit of extraordinary richness. Their story reached powerful investors already primed by American mining booms and discoveries of diamonds in South Africa. A supposed new fortune was suddenly waiting somewhere in the American West.

Diamond
Locality: Russia
Field of view: 4.5 mm
Description: These diamonds were a gift from Mark Andrews. Thanks Mark. He obtained them from Paul Krush of GemHunt.Jerry Cone, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Even Tiffany Helped Make The Story Look Real

Investors brought samples to celebrated jeweler Charles Lewis Tiffany, who declared them precious stones of enormous value. A respected mining engineer later inspected the secret field and also accepted it as genuine after finding stones scattered across the ground. Newspapers helped spread the resulting diamond fever. What they did not know was that Arnold and Slack had purchased gems and deliberately planted them at the site.

Charles Lewis Tiffany (1812-1902)Unknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Clarence King Finally Noticed The Ground Was Too Perfect

Geologist Clarence King and members of his federal survey inspected the field in 1872 and quickly noticed suspicious patterns. Gems appeared only in disturbed ground, and combinations of stones occurred in ways nature was unlikely to produce. King's team concluded that the field had been salted and hurried to expose the fraud. The San Francisco Chronicle responded with enormous headlines announcing the "Mammoth Fraud," turning the debunking into nearly as big a story as the discovery.

Image of Clarence King, the first director of United States Geological Survey.Unknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

New Yorkers Woke Up To Lions In The Streets

On November 9, 1874, the New York Herald published a terrifying account claiming that animals had escaped from the Central Park menagerie. The story described lions, tigers, hyenas, a polar bear, and other animals rampaging through Manhattan. It supplied gruesome casualty figures and even included a supposed mayoral proclamation. Readers encountered what looked like a fully reported urban catastrophe.

File:NYC-CentralPark (1869) p114 The Dovecote.jpgMetilsteiner, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Newspaper Hid The Truth At The Bottom

The article eventually admitted that the entire disaster was fictional. Unfortunately, that disclosure appeared only after readers had worked through a long and frightening report packed with realistic details. The Washington Post notes that the story caused genuine alarm in the city. The stunt exploited a problem still familiar today: many people react to the headline long before reaching the correction.

This is a picture of my mother holding the Washington News Paper on Monday, July 21st 1969 stating 'The Eagle Has Landed Two Men Walk on the Moon'. The photo was taken by my grandfather Jack Weir (1928-2005).Jack Weir (1928-2005), Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Backlash Was Immediate

Other newspapers mocked and condemned the Herald for frightening New Yorkers simply to create a sensation. A contemporary Harper's Weekly cartoon attacked the paper and repeated the admission that the story had been a huge hoax. The episode showed how fierce newspaper competition could reward sensationalism even when editors knew their story was false. More than a century before viral misinformation, a dramatic headline had already outrun its disclaimer.

Cover of June 20, 1861 issue of New York Herald covering the American Civil WarNew York Herald, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Denver Reporters Invented The Destruction Of The Great Wall

In June 1899, several Denver reporters found themselves facing deadlines without much news. They invented a story claiming that American businessmen were traveling to China to negotiate the demolition of parts of the Great Wall and use the stone for road construction. The tale appeared in multiple Denver newspapers. It was deliberately set far away, where checking the facts would be difficult.

Photograph of The Great Wall of China from 1907.Herbert Ponting, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Other Newspapers Improved The Lie

The fake story did not remain confined to Colorado. Other newspapers picked it up and embellished it with new details, including supposed confirmation from Chinese officials. Denver Public Library research shows how the original prank grew as later retellings added material that the first reporters had never invented. A fabrication designed merely to fill newspaper space acquired apparent credibility through repetition.

Source: Oscar B. Olson publisher
Web source:

http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/cgi-bin/sheetmusic.pl?ColBackToDear&Colorado&mainThe original uploader was Pepso at English Wikipedia., Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

A Second Hoax Grew Around The First One

Decades later, an even wilder claim appeared: that the Great Wall story had angered people in China so badly that it helped trigger the Boxer Rebellion. Denver Public Library researchers found no evidence for that connection and noted that the rebellion's roots clearly predated the newspaper prank. The history therefore contains two layers of misinformation. First newspapers spread the Great Wall hoax, then later storytellers invented an exaggerated story about what the hoax itself had supposedly caused.

Part of the Great Wall of China (April 1853, X, p.41)Wesleyan Methodist Missionary Society, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Piltdown Man Seemed To Solve Human Evolution

In 1912, amateur antiquarian Charles Dawson and Natural History Museum paleontologist Arthur Smith Woodward announced fossil remains from Piltdown, England. The finds appeared to combine a humanlike skull with an apelike jaw, seemingly providing the evolutionary "missing link" many researchers expected. The discovery attracted tremendous scientific and newspaper attention. Britain appeared to have produced one of the most important human fossils ever found.

Dr. A. S. Woodward of the British Museum (Natural History)Unknown photographer, Wikimedia Commons

The Fake Survived For Forty Years

Some anatomists questioned Piltdown Man from the beginning, but the fossils retained significant scientific credibility for decades. The supposed discovery influenced discussions of human evolution and distracted attention from genuine fossils found elsewhere. Part of the fraud's success came from limited access to the original material. Scientists were often forced to work from casts rather than closely examining the actual bones.

The portrait painted by John Cooke in 1915. Back row: (left to right) F. O. Barlow, G. Elliot Smith, Charles Dawson, Arthur Smith Woodward. Front row: A. S. Underwood, Arthur Keith, W. P. Pycraft, and Sir Ray Lankester. Note the painting of Charles DarwinJohn Cooke, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

New Tests Finally Destroyed The Missing Link

By the early 1950s, fluorine dating and closer anatomical analysis showed that the skull and jaw did not belong together. The skull was human, while the jaw came from an orangutan, and teeth had been filed to appear more human. The bones had also been artificially stained to make them seem ancient. Later forensic work has pointed strongly toward Dawson as the central perpetrator of one of science's most damaging hoaxes.

Reconstruction of Eoanthropus dawsoniUnknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Two Girls Photographed Fairies In Yorkshire

In 1917, cousins Elsie Wright and Frances Griffiths produced photographs appearing to show them interacting with tiny fairies near Cottingley in Yorkshire. The images began as a family curiosity but eventually reached people interested in Spiritualism and supernatural phenomena. The photographs seemed especially compelling during an era when photographic images still carried an aura of mechanical objectivity. Soon, the fairies had escaped the family album.

The fourth of the Cottingley Fairies photographs, showing Elsie Wright with a fairyFrances Griffiths, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Sherlock Holmes's Creator Believed Them

Arthur Conan Doyle, creator of Sherlock Holmes and a committed Spiritualist, became convinced that the photographs supported the existence of fairies. He featured them in a 1920 article for The Strand Magazine and later expanded his case in The Coming of the Fairies. His fame gave the photographs a credibility they might otherwise never have achieved. Newspapers and magazines debated the images while Doyle defended them publicly.

Arthur Conan DoyleWalter Benington, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Fairies Were Paper Cutouts

Decades later, Elsie and Frances acknowledged that the famous photographs had been staged. The supposed fairies had been copied from illustrations and positioned for the camera. By then, however, the images had spent generations circulating as evidence in arguments about supernatural phenomena. The Cottingley episode became a classic lesson in how a prestigious believer can help ordinary photographs acquire extraordinary authority.

The third of the Cottingley Fairies photographs, showing Frances Griffiths with a fairyElsie Wright, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Mencken Invented America's Bathtub History

On December 28, 1917, journalist H.L. Mencken published an article in the New York Evening Mail titled “A Neglected Anniversary.” He claimed that the modern bathtub had been introduced to America in Cincinnati in 1842 and had initially provoked medical and political controversy. Mencken even credited President Millard Fillmore with helping make bathing respectable by installing a bathtub in the White House. The entire history was fabricated.

Photograph of H. L. MenckenBen Pinchot, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Fake Facts Escaped Into Reference Books

Mencken's invented details were repeatedly reprinted by other newspapers as legitimate history. They eventually appeared in speeches, serious publications, reference works, and other supposedly authoritative sources. The specificity of his fake dates, names, and citations made the piece look thoroughly researched. A joke had become harder to dislodge each time another publication treated an earlier repetition as evidence.

H.L. Mencken on his 75th birthday by A. Aubrey BodineA. Aubrey Bodine, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Even Mencken Could Not Kill His Own Hoax

Mencken publicly confessed in 1926 that he had invented the bathtub history. Astonishingly, the false account continued circulating afterward, and some readers apparently suspected that the confession itself was the hoax. American Heritage admitted decades later that it had inadvertently helped repeat Mencken's fiction. His prank became a near-perfect example of why corrections have always struggled to catch stories people enjoy believing.

Portrait of H. L. Mencken by Carl Van Vechten. Gift, Carl Van Vechten Estate. The Library of Congress, Washington, D. C.Carl Van Vechten, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Stern Announced Hitler's Secret Diaries

In April 1983, West German magazine Stern announced that reporter Gerd Heidemann had obtained a huge collection of supposed Adolf Hitler diaries. The discovery became an international sensation, and publication rights were sold abroad, including to Britain's Sunday Times. Respected historian Hugh Trevor-Roper initially endorsed their authenticity. Editors believed they possessed documents capable of rewriting major portions of modern history.

Gerd Heidemann während einer Vortragsreise auf der AIDAsolRandolph33, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Forgeries Were Surprisingly Crude

Forger Konrad Kujau had created the books using modern materials while imitating Hitler's handwriting. He artificially aged pages, and later forensic examination found that the paper,ink, and other materials dated from after Hitler's death. Historical mistakes also appeared throughout the supposed diaries. The extraordinary scale of the collection had ironically helped convince some experts because forging dozens of volumes seemed too absurdly ambitious to contemplate.

Konrad Kujau, author of the Hitler-Diaries, King of Forger and Fright of all Historians, in front of one of his Works. This photo was shot in 1992 in his Galerie in Stuttgart, Germany.Telephil, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Fact-Checking Arrived After The Headlines

West German government tests exposed the diaries as counterfeit only days after the international publication campaign began. Stern suffered enormous embarrassment, newspaper editors lost jobs, and Trevor-Roper's reputation took a serious blow. Kujau eventually confessed to creating the documents and was imprisoned for his role in the fraud. The scandal occurred in the modern newsroom era, but it repeated a lesson newspapers had been learning since 1835: excitement can still outrun verification when everyone desperately wants the scoop.

A diary entry of Hermann Burte, a German and Alemannic poet from the 10-14-1943, stating that he no longer wanted to make speeches in public; he wants the German spirit to win without weapons; he writes,Albärt, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

You May Also Like:

These Socialites Hid Sordid Secrets

Historical Geniuses Who Were Complete Disasters Outside Their Field

History's Most Unbelievable Screwups

Sources:  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31


More from Factinate

More from Factinate




Dear reader,


Want to tell us to write facts on a topic? We’re always looking for your input! Please reach out to us to let us know what you’re interested in reading. Your suggestions can be as general or specific as you like, from “Life” to “Compact Cars and Trucks” to “A Subspecies of Capybara Called Hydrochoerus Isthmius.” We’ll get our writers on it because we want to create articles on the topics you’re interested in. Please submit feedback to hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your time!


Do you question the accuracy of a fact you just read? At Factinate, we’re dedicated to getting things right. Our credibility is the turbo-charged engine of our success. We want our readers to trust us. Our editors are instructed to fact check thoroughly, including finding at least three references for each fact. However, despite our best efforts, we sometimes miss the mark. When we do, we depend on our loyal, helpful readers to point out how we can do better. Please let us know if a fact we’ve published is inaccurate (or even if you just suspect it’s inaccurate) by reaching out to us at hello@factinate.com. Thanks for your help!


Warmest regards,



The Factinate team




✕

Want to learn something new every day?

Join thousands of others and start your morning with our Fact Of The Day newsletter.

Thank you!

Error, please try again.
✕