scorecardresearch

When Hungarian professor Erno Rubik made his first 3×3 cube in 1974, he didn’t realize he was making a toy that would take the world by storm. He didn’t even realize he’d made a puzzle. But then, after fiddling around with the device and scrambling it up, he quickly realized he couldn’t get it back to how it started.

As Rubik put it, “It was a code I myself had invented, yet I could not read it.” And, unfortunately for him, Rubik couldn’t simply google “How to solve a Rubik’s Cube?” as most people do today.


The First Solve

He couldn’t have possibly known, but the cube he’d invented contained 43,000,000,000, 000,000,000 combinations. His seemingly simple invention was deceivingly complex and solving it was no simple task.

But Rubik was persistent, and after a month of wracking his brain, he finally returned his puzzle to its original state. It took a lot of trial and error, but he eventually used a method of rearranging each side’s corners first—one that would seem quite primitive to today’s Cubers—but he succeeded.

The Magic Cube

Realizing he was onto something, Rubik patented his Magic Cube in 1975 and it began to sell like gangbusters in his hometown of Budapest, but it would be four years until it became a worldwide sensation. At the time, Hungary was behind the Iron Curtain, and distributing products worldwide was far from simple.

In 1980, Rubik’s invention finally made it into peoples’ hands all over the world. Around the same time, the Magic Cube was renamed the Rubik’s Cube to credit its inventor.

How to Solve a Rubik’s Cube

The same year the Rubik’s Cube was released worldwide, David Singmaster published the first method for solving it. His layer-by-layer strategy was easy enough to grasp, and it’s still commonly used to teach beginners today.

Singmaster introduced “algorithms” to cube solving. An algorithm is a memorized sequence of different moves that will have a specific effect on the cube’s position. All cubing methods the people use today require you to memorize a series of algorithms and to execute them in a specific order. Algorithms are how you solve a Rubik’s Cube—but there’s more than one way to skin a cat, so they say.

How to Solve a Rubik’s Cube…Fast

Speedcubing contests followed in the wake of Rubik’s success, and people began to develop new ways to solve the cubes faster and faster. In 1982, an American teenager named Minh Thai won a contest by solving a cube in just 22.95. Thai eventually wrote a book called The Winning Solution which detailed his corners-first method. But today, people solve Rubik’s Cubes a lot faster than that—and to do so, they needed a different strategy.

Then, in 1997, Jessica Friedrich developed a new speedcubing method and published it online. Her method, commonly called CFOP, is the gold standard for solving a Rubik’s Cube as fast as possible. The current world record for solving a cube, a blistering 3.47 seconds, was done with Friedrich’s method.

Follow The Steps

But while Friedrich’s method is the fastest, it is extremely complex, and not recommended for beginners. The layer by layer method first published by Singmaster is easier to grasp on your first time around, but detailed instructions for both are available online. The algorithms seem daunting at first, but with some persistence, anyone can solve a Rubik’s Cube.

Or, if you’re really stubborn, you could try solving your Rubik’s Cube like Erno Rubik first did in 1974, with no information to help you. It only took him a month, maybe you can do better? After all, there are only 43 quintillion ways it could go wrong.

Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4


Factinate Featured Logo Featured Article
When Edward VIII’s baby brother Prince John died of severe seizure at only 13 years old, Edward’s response was so disturbing it’s impossible to forget.
43 Scandalous Facts About Edward VIII, The King Who Lost His Crown 43 Scandalous Facts About Edward VIII, The King Who Lost His Crown “I wanted to be an up-to-date king. But I didn't have much time.”—King Edward VIII. For such a short-reigning king, Edward VIII left behind no shortage of controversy. First, there was the scandalous womanizing of…
Factinate Featured Logo Featured Article
The average person doesn't even get 50% correct. I guess it's hard to be smarter than an 8th grader...
Quiz: Are You Smarter Than An Eighth-Grader? Quiz: Are You Smarter Than An Eighth-Grader?
Factinate Featured Logo Featured Article
I had an imaginary friend named Charlie. My parents asked what he looked like, and I always replied “a little man.” When we moved away, Charlie didn't come with us. My mom asked where he was, and I told her that he was going to be a mannequin at Sears—but that wasn’t even the most disturbing part. The years passed by and I’d forgotten my imaginary friend, but when someone told me a story about my old house, I was chilled to the bone.
People Describe Creepy Imaginary Friends from Their Childhood People Describe Creepy Imaginary Friends from Their Childhood “I was a loner as a child. I had an imaginary friend—I didn't bother with him.”—George Carlin. Many adults had imaginary friends as children. At their best, these make-believe buddies were cute, helpful, and whimsical…
Factinate Featured Logo Featured Article
The average person only gets 10 right. You muggles don't stand a chance...
Quiz: How Much Do You Really Know About Harry Potter? Quiz: How Much Do You Really Know About Harry Potter?


Dear reader,

Want to tell us to write facts on a topic? We’re always looking for your input! Please reach out to us to let us know what you’re interested in reading. Your suggestions can be as general or specific as you like, from “Life” to “Compact Cars and Trucks” to “A Subspecies of Capybara Called Hydrochoerus Isthmius.” We’ll get our writers on it because we want to create articles on the topics you’re interested in. Please submit feedback to contribute@factinate.com. Thanks for your time!

Do you question the accuracy of a fact you just read? At Factinate, we’re dedicated to getting things right. Our credibility is the turbo-charged engine of our success. We want our readers to trust us. Our editors are instructed to fact check thoroughly, including finding at least three references for each fact. However, despite our best efforts, we sometimes miss the mark. When we do, we depend on our loyal, helpful readers to point out how we can do better. Please let us know if a fact we’ve published is inaccurate (or even if you just suspect it’s inaccurate) by reaching out to us at contribute@factinate.com. Thanks for your help!

Warmest regards,

The Factinate team