The story goes like this: one day, King Louis XIV’s second wife, Madame de Maintenon, stepped into a rather unassuming French convent. While in its quiet, hallowed walls, she paid a visit to the dark-skinned Sister Louise Marie Therese—but this was far from a light social visit for the two women. Maintenon reportedly ordered the Sister to cease and desist from claiming that she was not an ordinary nun, but was, in fact, the daughter of the King of France. The Black Nun of Moret, as we now call her, was said to have replied sharply, “Madame, the fact that a lady of your rank has taken the trouble to come here with the express purpose of telling me that I am not the king’s daughter convinces me that I am.” Pause for fist pumps.
Scathing replies aside, this interchange doesn’t just reveal Madame de Maintenon’s personal jealousy in matters of the French crown, it also speaks to larger insecurities about the purity of the French aristocracy at the time. In a world where the (white) monarch held absolute power handed down from God, the Black Nun of Moret crept in between the cracks of this dominance, blurring strict lines of race and class. If she, obviously a child of French colonial expansion, could firmly and proudly call herself a King’s daughter, how stable or absolute was the traditional view of Monarchy? And Louise Marie Therese certainly staked her claim to this lineage: the Duke of Saint-Simon records that she once greeted the Dauphin, the heir to France, as “brother.”
Unsurprisingly, given the potential scandal, France just couldn’t stop talking about her. She makes appearances in the memoirs of illustrious figures such as Madame de Maintenon, Madame de Montespan, and even Voltaire. Like the Sister herself, this gossip slips between official histories, refusing to be either refuted or contained. But why should it be contained? The tale of the Black Nun of Moret is a tale of intrigue—of secret babies, illicit affairs, and courtly betrayal—where truth and fiction mingle, and where the French throne could be made and re-made in whispers. It’s too saucy a story not to tell.
The Lost Child
The rumors of an illegitimate royal child started before Madame de Maintenon’s convent visit—and not with King Louis XIV, but with his first wife, Queen Maria Theresa. In 1664, the Queen gave birth to a premature baby named Marie-Anne who died shortly after. When courtiers saw the newborn, they balked: she had dark skin. Rumors swirled that Maria Theresa’s close companion, an African little person, had impregnated the Queen of France, and that this child was the fruit of his labor. The Duchess of Montpensier, also known as Le Grande Mademoiselle, wrote that “the baby girl, which she [the Queen] had given birth to, resembled a small Moor,” “moor” being 17th-century speak for what we might consider “black.” The Duchess also sadly noted that “[the baby] would die.” It’s a scandalous, tragic tale, but the anxiety about a possible mixed-race child of the throne lived on long past poor baby Marie-Anne.
In fact, according to some rumors, little Marie-Anne was falsely reported dead and then secreted away to be brought up far from the prying eyes of the court, only to resurface later as the Black Nun of Moret. Though it’s a juicy piece of gossip, historians now believe that the doomed baby’s dark skin was actually caused by a lack of oxygen during the Queen’s difficult labor. Even so, after Maria Theresa’s own death in 1683, the rumor mill exploded with gossip about this mysterious 1664 birth that we are still trying to sort out today. Was the Black Nun of Moret actually Maria Theresa’s long-lost daughter? Or was she the King’s own issue, as she claimed?
Are You My Daddy?
The two rumors became dark doubles of each other, twin lines of lineage leading to different sides of France’s royal union. In actuality, the evidence that Louise Marie Therese sprang from the King’s loins is more compelling, but it has suffered a greater historical erasure. Like Madame de Maintenon, the philosopher Voltaire met the nun in person, and he remarked how much she looked like the king, not the queen. There’s also the fact that 17th-century accounts report that the queen’s baby did die. Perhaps most telling of all, King Louis XIV sent Sister Louise a pension on October 15, 1695, “to be paid to her all her life in this convent or everywhere she could be, by the guards of the Royal treasure present and to come.”
There is no firm evidence, however, that Louis had a black mistress. Then again, women of color were not given the same privileges, nor the same detailed historical attention, as the King’s white maitresses-en-titres. Nonetheless, historian Greg Jenner has speculated, since France often traded with North Africa, that Louis may have come into contact (to say the least) with an African woman, producing a black child. He was certainly not known for his fidelity to the queen, and frequently carried on long, extravagant affairs. The Black Nun’s true history, however, died with her in 1732.
Thus, the tale of Louise Marie Therese, the Black Nun of Moret, contains two histories, equally scandalous and equally incomplete. Yet she did exist, and there is enough of a historical paper trail left to point directly to the throne of France. Madame de Maintenon may have wanted to sweep Sister Louise under the rug, but she and her story kept bleeding through the boundaries—slipping from ear to ear in whispers, exposing the royal dirty laundry, and redefining the aristocratic lineage of France, if ever so slightly and illegitimately. If we think of European history as a record of white monarchs and divine power, we ignore these whispers: people of color, whether through colonial expansion, bedroom trysts, or both, are very much a part of that history. It’s just that Louise Marie Therese’s pedigree happens to go all the way up to the very throne of France.
More from Factinate
Want to tell us to write facts on a topic? We’re always looking for your input! Please reach out to us to let us know what you’re interested in reading. Your suggestions can be as general or specific as you like, from “Life” to “Compact Cars and Trucks” to “A Subspecies of Capybara Called Hydrochoerus Isthmius.” We’ll get our writers on it because we want to create articles on the topics you’re interested in. Please submit feedback to email@example.com. Thanks for your time!
Do you question the accuracy of a fact you just read? At Factinate, we’re dedicated to getting things right. Our credibility is the turbo-charged engine of our success. We want our readers to trust us. Our editors are instructed to fact check thoroughly, including finding at least three references for each fact. However, despite our best efforts, we sometimes miss the mark. When we do, we depend on our loyal, helpful readers to point out how we can do better. Please let us know if a fact we’ve published is inaccurate (or even if you just suspect it’s inaccurate) by reaching out to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Thanks for your help!
The Factinate team