In a way, litigation is the backbone of a civil society. The right to an impartial court, willing to hear out both sides, is what allows us to resolve disputes small and large without resorting to violence, or petty revenge. Formal court is much more dignified than, say, trial by combat.
Granted, every human society that’s every existed most likely developed some form of conflict resolution. And the notion of a third-party mediator is similarly common. But in tribal communities, or those with less equal forms of social order, it’s likely that mediator had absolute power to both decide a resolution, and to enforce it. A king’s word was law… and that’s hardly fair. Who’s gonna argue with the Big Cheese?
Today we expect our laws and lawmakers to adhere to a more democratic standard. Again, in theory.
In this regard, much of the world is indebted to England. After the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215, the King (or Queen) of England subsequently wielded much less power. In the ensuing centuries, a more democratic and fair form of government arose, centered around an established parliament, and the introduction of civil courts. When the British empire later formed colonies around the world, their particular form of justice spread along with other British customs.
The drawback of civil courts, though, can be a tendency to abuse them. The lawsuit is a powerful tool for equality, but it can also be easily misused by those who are looking for unfair advantage. Massive corporations will sometimes use veritable armies of lawyers to impose their will on those less able to do so. And similarly (though on a smaller scale) some people will use the right to civil procedure as a route to a quick buck.
But what separates a frivolous suit from something more legitimate? That’s a question that’s plagued lawmakers and judges for centuries. In many cases, what might seem unreasonable is, on closer inspection, genuine grounds for a case. Just as often, the opposite is true. All we can do is hope our appointed officials are able to see the truth.
Not to say we won’t second-guess their decisions! When it comes to the cases presented here, we’ll let you be the judge.
Thanks for watching.
More from Factinate
Want to tell us to write facts on a topic? We’re always looking for your input! Please reach out to us to let us know what you’re interested in reading. Your suggestions can be as general or specific as you like, from “Life” to “Compact Cars and Trucks” to “A Subspecies of Capybara Called Hydrochoerus Isthmius.” We’ll get our writers on it because we want to create articles on the topics you’re interested in. Please submit feedback to email@example.com. Thanks for your time!
Do you question the accuracy of a fact you just read? At Factinate, we’re dedicated to getting things right. Our credibility is the turbo-charged engine of our success. We want our readers to trust us. Our editors are instructed to fact check thoroughly, including finding at least three references for each fact. However, despite our best efforts, we sometimes miss the mark. When we do, we depend on our loyal, helpful readers to point out how we can do better. Please let us know if a fact we’ve published is inaccurate (or even if you just suspect it’s inaccurate) by reaching out to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Thanks for your help!
The Factinate team